Processed: reassign bugs to gnat-13

2023-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 244936 gnat-13 13.2.0-5 Bug #244936 [gnat-12] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22) Bug reassigned from package 'gnat-12' to 'gnat-13'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12/12-20220319-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of b

Processed: gnat-12: Legal program rejected (record component with no supplied value) and invalid access to atomic variable

2023-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign 643663 gnat-13 13.2.0-5 Bug #643663 [gnat-12] Legal program rejected (record component with no supplied value) and invalid access to atomic variable Bug reassigned from package 'gnat-12' to 'gnat-13'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12/12-20220319

Bug#643663: gnat-12: Legal program rejected (record component with no supplied value) and invalid access to atomic variable

2023-10-20 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: gnat-12 Followup-For: Bug #643663 Control: reassign 643663 gnat-13 13.2.0-5 Control: retitle 643663 gnat: invalid access to atomic variable Hello. With gnat-13, the following sources compile without error. On the other hand, the invalid access to the atomic variable may not be fixed. Do

Bug#998177: marked as done (gnat: segfault in tree_could_trap_p when C double parameter, -O2 -gnatn -gnatVa (regression))

2023-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:00:08 +0200 with message-id and subject line close 998177 has caused the Debian Bug report #998177, regarding gnat: segfault in tree_could_trap_p when C double parameter, -O2 -gnatn -gnatVa (regression) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: bug 1054272 is forwarded to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892

2023-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1054272 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 Bug #1054272 [src:gcc-13] gcc-13: Regression in SH backend results in binutils FTBFS Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892'. > t

Bug#1054272: gcc-13: Regression in SH backend results in binutils FTBFS

2023-10-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: gcc-13 Version: 13.2.0-5 Severity: normal Tags: upstream User: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sh4 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org Hello! There is currently a known regression in gcc-13 which causes binutils and e2fsprogs to FTBFS on sh4 [1][2]: libtool: compile: s