LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-13.2.0 revision
c891d8dc23e1a46ad9f3e757d09e57b500d40044
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is riscv64-unknown-linux-gn
Your message dated Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:22:53 +0200
with message-id
and subject line really closing for real
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016903,
regarding tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is
working)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 9:23 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 1:31 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> > upstream asks for a self-contained test case. Not sure if that's something
> > you
> > tried in https://bugs.debian.org/1050415
>
> Currently working on PR/111231. cresult is diff
Version: 12.2.0-18
malat@barriere ~ % apt-cache policy gcc-12
gcc-12:
Installed: 12.2.0-18
Candidate: 12.2.0-18
Version table:
*** 12.2.0-18 100
1 https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
12.2.0-14 500
500 https://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1016903 12.2.0-8
Bug #1016903 [g++-12] tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level
(-fno-tree-vectorize is working)
No longer marked as fixed in versions gcc-12/12.2.0-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
5 matches
Mail list logo