autoconf2.64 is marked for autoremoval from testing

2023-07-25 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
autoconf2.64 2.64+dfsg-1.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2023-07-25 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1039531: autoconf2.64: Keep out of testing https://bugs.debian.org/1039531 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_a

Processed: autofdo: diff for NMU version 0.19-2.3

2023-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1017677 + patch Bug #1017677 [src:autofdo] autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1017677 + pending Bug #1017677 [src:autofdo] autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1017677: https://bugs.debian.o

Bug#1017677: autofdo: diff for NMU version 0.19-2.3

2023-07-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tags 1017677 + patch Control: tags 1017677 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for autofdo (versioned as 0.19-2.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru autofdo-0.19/debian/changelog autofdo-0.19/debian/cha

Bug#1017677: autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14

2023-07-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 25.07.23 14:30, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Hi, On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:25:43 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:43:14 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the > archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -14. > > We

Processing of autofdo_0.19-2.3_source.changes

2023-07-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
autofdo_0.19-2.3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: autofdo_0.19-2.3.dsc autofdo_0.19-2.3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1017677: autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14

2023-07-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:25:43 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:43:14 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the > archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -14. > > We are trying NOT to ship Bookworm with llvm