Re: stop building the native mips* packages from the gcc-11, binutils and gcc-defaults packages

On 5/7/21 3:39 AM, YunQiang Su wrote: > Matthias Klose 于2021年5月6日周四 下午5:19写道： >> >> Hi syq, >> >> when uploading gcc-11 to unstable, I'll fail the build for mipsel and >> mips64el. >> Please start building gcc-11 from it's own source package for the mipsel and >> mips64el binaries. >> > > Yes. I

Re: stop building the native mips* packages from the gcc-11, binutils and gcc-defaults packages

Matthias Klose 于2021年5月6日周四 下午5:19写道： > > Hi syq, > > when uploading gcc-11 to unstable, I'll fail the build for mipsel and > mips64el. > Please start building gcc-11 from it's own source package for the mipsel and > mips64el binaries. > Yes. It is our problem to leave the upstream bug to Debian

[bts-link] source package gcc-9

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-9 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #945133 (http://bugs.debian.org/945133) #

stop building the native mips* packages from the gcc-11, binutils and gcc-defaults packages

Hi syq, when uploading gcc-11 to unstable, I'll fail the build for mipsel and mips64el. Please start building gcc-11 from it's own source package for the mipsel and mips64el binaries. The past years have shown for me, that I'm spending too much time caring for mipsen issues, and as long as these