[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning (virtual PHI with MEM)

2020-10-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #35

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 grave On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:44:44PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On 10/26/20 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: libgcc-s1 > > Version: 10.2.0-15 > > Severity: grave > > > > On a buster system, with unstable pinned to low priori

Processed: Re: Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #972936 [libgcc-s1] libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10) Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 972936: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972936 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #972936 [libgcc-s1] libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10) Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 972936: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972936 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: severity -1 important On 10/26/20 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: libgcc-s1 > Version: 10.2.0-15 > Severity: grave > > On a buster system, with unstable pinned to low priority: Lowering the severity. Feel free to correct me if this specific configuration deserves RC severity.