* Paul Gevers:
> * Concern for armel and armhf: only secondary upstream support in GCC
>(Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch and buster)
glibc upstream lately has trouble finding qualified persons to
implement security fixes for the 32-bit Arm architecture.
> * Concern
Hi,
[Note, this e-mail may look familiar as it is mostly copied over from
the buster call, not much has changed, AFAICT].
As part of the interim architecture qualification for bullseye, we
request that DSA, the security team, Wanna build, and the toolchain
maintainers review and update their list
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:37:23 +0200 Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> Commit 2e5e37249f09e54bb62e3ab87508e43ff709a4fb should improve the
> situation.
> It reverts the part affecting s-os_lib.adb. A GCC build produces the
> same checksum for it than 9.3.0-8 in libgnat-9, hopefully making gnat
> usable
3 matches
Mail list logo
