No target suite found. Please check your target distribution and that you
uploaded to the right archive.
Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new fi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 935902 g++-9
Bug #935902 [libcppunit-dev] libcppunit-dev: segfault when using with a program
compiled with g++-9
Bug reassigned from package 'libcppunit-dev' to 'g++-9'.
No longer marked as found in versions cppunit/1.14.0-4.
Ignoring re
reassign 935902 g++-9
affects 935902 libcppunit-dev
found 935902 9.2.1-12
close 935902 9.2.1-16
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:15:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The comment about cppunit made me look at the cppunit package to find
> #935902, and yes, the test case is reproducible. So
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Oct 30 12:04:51 UTC 2019 (revision 277619)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running ta
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Oct 30 12:04:51 UTC 2019 (revision 277619)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== brig tests ===
Running tar
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Oct 30 12:04:51 UTC 2019 (revision 277619)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target unix
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests 5
>> And afaik there was no test rebuild for bullseye
>> either.
>
> It does not help to blame people for not doing a rebuild when there is no
rebuild necessary.
Please could you turn off your mode feeling attacked by any email, before you
understood these?
On 31.10.19 15:33, rene.engelh...@ma
Hi,
Am 31. Oktober 2019 15:15:10 MEZ schrieb Matthias Klose :
>And afaik there was no test rebuild for
>bullseye
>either.
Accepted cppunit 1.14.0-4 (source) into unstable
On July 26:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1049803/accepted-cppunit-1140-4-source-into-unstable/
Buster release was 3 wee
Hi,
Am 31. Oktober 2019 15:15:10 MEZ schrieb Matthias Klose :
>On 29.10.19 15:09, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2019-10-29 13:09:46 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote:
>>> Am 29. Oktober 2019 12:49:44 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre
>:
In case makefile magic triggers some rebuild, you can als
On 29.10.19 15:09, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2019-10-29 13:09:46 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote:
Am 29. Oktober 2019 12:49:44 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre :
In case makefile magic triggers some rebuild, you can also run the
generated executable directly (with the right environment varia
10 matches
Mail list logo
