gcc-7_7.4.0-12_source.changes REJECTED

2019-08-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. binary:gcc-7-source is NEW. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Processing of gcc-7_7.4.0-12_source.changes

2019-08-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-7_7.4.0-12_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-7_7.4.0-12.dsc gcc-7_7.4.0-12.diff.gz gcc-7_7.4.0-12_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#935275: marked as done (dustmite: FTBFS on amd64)

2019-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2019 20:57:47 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#931825: Dub executable does not run has caused the Debian Bug report #933675, regarding dustmite: FTBFS on amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#933675: marked as done (gdc-8: Unable to link D applications against runtime/stdlib)

2019-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2019 20:57:47 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#931825: Dub executable does not run has caused the Debian Bug report #933675, regarding gdc-8: Unable to link D applications against runtime/stdlib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: GM2 documentation package

2019-08-31 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hello, ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 10:42, Matthias Klose : > > On 26.08.19 12:32, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Should I go ahead and package gm2 documentation as a part of gcc-9-doc > > package or should I wait for a few months to let it land safely in > > Debian? > > The gm2 docume