Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:21:42 +0100
Source: gcc-8-cross
Binary: gcc-8-cross-base gcc-8-x86-64-linux-gnu-base libgcc1-amd64-cross
libgcc-8-dev-amd64-cross lib32gcc1-amd64-cross lib32gcc-8-dev-amd64-cross
libx32gcc1-amd64-
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:23:11 +0100
Source: gcc-8-cross-ports
Binary: gcc-8-cross-base-ports gcc-8-alpha-linux-gnu-base libgcc1-alpha-cross
libgcc-8-dev-alpha-cross gcc-8-alpha-linux-gnu gcc-8-plugin-dev-alpha-linux-gnu
gcc-8-cross-ports_15_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross-ports_15.dsc
gcc-8-cross-ports_15.tar.xz
gcc-8-cross-ports_15_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
gcc-8-cross_23_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross_23.dsc
gcc-8-cross_23.tar.xz
gcc-8-cross_23_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #914688 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:gcc-8] g++: fails to
understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #914688 to the same values
previously set
> retitle -1 "boost: please do not use __linux macro
control: reopen -1
control: retitle -1 "boost: please do not use __linux macro"
control: reassign -1 boost1.67
control: found -1 1.67.0-10
> closing as won't fix, same as upstream did. Just use the __linux__ macro.
as said over irc, I would like the fix to be shipped in boost, so I prefer to
r
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
closing as won't fix, same as upstream did. Just use the __linux__ macro.
On 26.11.18 13:52, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: forwaded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:28:28PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> xnox@d
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #914688 [src:gcc-8] g++: fails to understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
914688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:10:17 +0100
with message-id <1e2aa3d0-11db-f217-f676-9574f7221...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#914688: Default defines discrepancy
has caused the Debian Bug report #914688,
regarding g++: fails to understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
to be marked as d
Control: forwaded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:28:28PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> xnox@diamond:~$ g++ -std=c++14 -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null | grep linux
> #define __linux__ 1
> #define __gnu_linux__ 1
>
> xnox@diamond:~$ g++ -std=gnu++
control: severity -1 serious
I reduced to a simple test case that involves no boost at all, and only a macro.
cat test.cpp
this code shows on ppc64el:
$ g++ test.cpp -std=c++14 -c
NO OUTPUT (wrong)
$ g++ test.cpp -c
test.cpp:2:2: warning: #warning defined linux [-Wcpp]
#warning defined
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #914688 [src:gcc-8] g++: fails to understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
914688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
xnox@diamond:~$ g++ -std=c++14 -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null | grep linux
#define __linux__ 1
#define __gnu_linux__ 1
xnox@diamond:~$ g++ -std=gnu++14 -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null | grep linux
#define __linux 1
#define __linux__ 1
#define __gnu_linux__ 1
#define linux 1
The same is not observed on o
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #914688 [src:gcc-8] g++: fails to understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #914688 [src:gcc-8] g++: fails to understand BOOST_OS_LINUX on ppc64el?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
9
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 26.11.18 11:23, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Source: gcc-8
> Version: 8.2.0-10
> Severity: serious
> Affects: src:performous
>
> Hello, after trying to debug why src:performous was FTBFS on ppc64el, I got
> this issue:
>
> test exa
Source: gcc-8
Version: 8.2.0-10
Severity: serious
Affects: src:performous
Hello, after trying to debug why src:performous was FTBFS on ppc64el, I got
this issue:
test example reproducing the issue:
cat test.c++
#include
#include
#if BOOST_OS_LINUX
#warning "OS LINUX DEFINED"
#endif
int main
16 matches
Mail list logo
