On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
> So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
> add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
that's how it is done for all cross packages. The
The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were reje
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6el-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa64r6-
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.dsc
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.tar.xz
cpp-8-mips64-linux-gnuabi64_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cro
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:48:05 +0200
Source: gcc-6
Binary: gcc-6-base libgcc-6-dev libgcc4 libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc-6-dev
lib32gcc-6-dev libn32gcc-6-dev libx32gcc-6-dev gcc-6 gcc-6-multilib
gcc-6-test-results gcc-6-plugin-dev
gcc-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cpp-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
cpp-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6-multilib_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
gcc-6-base_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
gcc-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2018-08-21 05:13:43.978918.
Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which add
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.dsc
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.tar.xz
cpp-8-mips64-linux-gnuabi64_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cro
As requested by YunQiang Su via mail
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:20:21 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#906753: Acknowledgement (GCC's -O2 optimization breaks
floating point precision or something else)
has caused the Debian Bug report #906753,
regarding GCC's -O2 optimization breaks floating point precision
Control: tags -1 important
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR87036
On 20.08.2018 21:53, Lumin wrote:
> This is the minimal code for repro #906753:
>
> OK with -O0, FAIL with -O2 on i386, ppc64el, ...
that always failed on i386 and ppc64el with -O2, so not a regression. You talked
about
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 important
Unknown tag/s: important.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ign
can you help to reject
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_1_amd64.changes
too.
In _1 I forget to upload binary=all packages, due to lack of -A option
of sbuild.
Debian FTP Masters 于2018年8月21日周二 下午1:13写道：
>
>
> gcc-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb: Does not match file
> already existing in t
13 matches
Mail list logo
