Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:d-itg src:gtk-gnutella
Bug #856809 [gcc-6] gcc-6 on ppc64el: internal compiler error in push_reload,
at reload.c:1349
Added indication that 856809 affects src:d-itg and src:gtk-gnutella
--
856809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856
Package: gcc-6
Version: 6.3.0-8
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:d-itg src:gtk-gnutella
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gtk-gnutella&arch=ppc64el&ver=1.1.8-2+b1&stamp=1488642493&raw=0
...
cc -c -I../.. -I.. -I../if/gen -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/powerpc64
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
binary:libasan2-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
binary:libitm1-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
binary:liblsan0-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
binary:libtsan0-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
binary:libubsan0-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
binary:libvtv0-powerpcspe-cross is NEW.
===
P
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 21:25:28 +0100
Source: gcc-5-cross
Binary: gcc-5-cross-base gcc-5-s390x-linux-gnu-base libgcc-5-dev-s390x-cross
lib32gcc-5-dev-s390x-cross gcc-5-s390x-linux-gnu gcc-5-multilib-s390x-linux-gnu
gcc-5-pl
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2017 21:08:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835777: fixed in gcc-5-cross 25
has caused the Debian Bug report #835777,
regarding gcc-5-cross: FTBFS: patch fails to apply
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
gcc-5-cross_25_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-5-cross_25.dsc
gcc-5-cross_25.tar.xz
gcc-5-cross_25_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
gcc-5-cross-ports_11_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-5-cross-ports_11.dsc
gcc-5-cross-ports_11.tar.xz
gcc-5-cross-ports_11_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On 04.03.2017 17:31, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> Package: gnat-7
> Followup-For: Bug #856042
>
> Thank you for applying the patch.
> The test script passes (with "V=v;export V;c" instead of "V=v c").
does it make sense to backport it to gcc-6=?
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 4 08:49:07 UTC 2017 (revision 245892)
Target: powerpc64le-linux-gnu
gcc version 5.4.1 20170304 (Debian 5.4.1-8)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 4 08:49:07 UTC 2017 (revision 245892)
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc version 5.4.1 20170304 (Debian 5.4.1-8)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 4 08:49:07 UTC 2017 (revision 245892)
Target: i686-linux-gnu
gcc version 5.4.1 20170304 (Debian 5.4.1-8)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration
Package: gnat-7
Followup-For: Bug #856042
Thank you for applying the patch.
The test script passes (with "V=v;export V;c" instead of "V=v c").
(5.4.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update to SVN 20170304 (r245892, 5.4.1) from the gcc-5-branch.
- Fix PR libstdc++/79789, PR target/79514 (x86), PR target/79544 (PPC),
PR lto/79579, PR target/79749 (sparc).
* Build-depend on gnat-5 again.
Checksums-Sha1
gcc-5_5.4.1-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-5_5.4.1-8.dsc
gcc-5_5.4.1-8.diff.gz
gcc-5_5.4.1-8_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
14 matches
Mail list logo