On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> 2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> Hi Ardian,
> >
> > Hi Bláint, ;-)
>
> I'm sorry. :-)
No problem. :-)
>...
> >> This in many cases also
Hi Adrian,
2016-10-23 13:26 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Hi Ardian,
>
> Hi Bláint, ;-)
I'm sorry. :-)
>
>> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
>> > Hi Bálint,
>> >
>> > there is some confusion regarding how static libraries shou
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Ardian,
Hi Bláint, ;-)
> 2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> > Hi Bálint,
> >
> > there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
> > compiled now.
> >
> > Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo
Hi Ardian,
2016-10-23 10:18 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk :
> Hi Bálint,
>
> there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
> compiled now.
>
> Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo.a with -fPIC".
>
> Why do these say -fPIC and not -fPIE?
I suggest using -fPIC, because then
Hi Bálint,
there is some confusion regarding how static libraries should be
compiled now.
Your bugs (e.g. #837350) say "Please build libfoo.a with -fPIC".
Why do these say -fPIC and not -fPIE?
My current understanding is that a binNMU would recompile the the static
library with PIE (not PIC),
5 matches
Mail list logo