GUO Yixuan writes:
>
> The drawback is that with direntry stubs, there's no "(gcc)" top nodes,
> only "(gcc-4.9)" top nodes, etc.
The plain "(gcc)" is important for the doc lookups in emacs and more.
Alas I don't know the best ways to make multiple copies co-exist.
Emacs does some stuff with sub
Source: gcc-4.9
Severity: normal
Hello,
The same content appeared twice in debian/gcc-BV-doc.doc-base.itm
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.9/debian/gcc-BV-doc.doc-base.itm?view=markup
Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 783979 gcc-4.9
Bug #783979 [gcc-4.7] libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.9 missing some symbols on
armel
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.7' to 'gcc-4.9'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.7/4.7.2-4 and gcc-4.9/4.9.2-10.
Ignoring req
clone 697521 -1
retitle -1 libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.9 missing some symbols on armel
found -1 gcc-4.9/4.9.2-10
thanks
Hi,
I think gcc-4.9 ist still missing at least std::exception_ptr and
std::rethrow_exception on armel, see:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gimagereader&arch=ar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 697521 -1
Bug #697521 [gcc-4.7] libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.7 missing some symbols on
armel
Bug 697521 cloned as bug 783979
> retitle -1 libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.9 missing some symbols on armel
Bug #783979 [gcc-4.7] libstdc++6 built from
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:42:05 +0200
Source: gcc-5
Binary: gcc-5-base libgcc1 libgcc1-dbg libgcc2 libgcc2-dbg libgcc-5-dev libgcc4
libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc1 lib64gcc1-dbg lib64gcc-5-dev lib32gcc1 lib32gcc1-dbg
lib32gcc-5-dev l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 783908 normal
Bug #783908 [cpp] new cpp conflicts break architecture bootstrap
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
783908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:12:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> there is no package inside the distribution where this would break anything.
> For
> the bootstrap you certainly can work around this by ignoring the conflicts.
> This
Since rebootstrap does not do native builds, it is non-trivial
binary:libn32gcc-5-dev is NEW.
binary:libn32gfortran-5-dev is NEW.
binary:libn32go7 is NEW.
binary:libn32go7-dbg is NEW.
binary:libn32objc-5-dev is NEW.
binary:libn32stdc++-5-dev is NEW.
binary:libn32stdc++6-5-dbg is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
f
On 05/01/2015 08:58 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: cpp
> Version: 4:4.9.2-3
> Severity: serious
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> The new cpp conflicts break architecture bootstrap. See for instance:
>
> https://jenkins.debian.net/job/rebootstrap_mips_gcc5_supported/9/co
gcc-5_5.1.1-3_ppc64el.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-5_5.1.1-3.dsc
gcc-5_5.1.1-3.diff.gz
gcc-5-source_5.1.1-3_all.deb
gcj-5-jre-lib_5.1.1-3_all.deb
gcj-5-source_5.1.1-3_all.deb
libgcj-doc_5.1.1-3_all.deb
libstdc++-5-doc_5.1.1-3_all.deb
libgccjit
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:49:59AM -0400, GUO Yixuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:09:53PM +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> > Package: gcc-doc
> > Version: 5:4.9.1-3
> > Severity: normal
> > File: /usr/share/info/gcc.info.gz
> >
> > With recent emacs-lucid 24.
Package: cpp
Version: 4:4.9.2-3
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
The new cpp conflicts break architecture bootstrap. See for instance:
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/rebootstrap_mips_gcc5_supported/9/console
The collateral damage induced by these conflicts simply
13 matches
Mail list logo
