gnat-4.6 is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-08-29 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
gnat-4.6 4.6.4-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 747990: gnat-4.6: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.6) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

Processed: forcibly merging 759558 759765

2014-08-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 759558 759765 Bug #759558 [gcj-4.9-jdk] gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h Bug #759765 [gcj-4.9-jdk] gcj-4.9-jdk: Invalid symlinks prevent building against the jdk Merged 759558 759765 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#759765: gcj-4.9-jdk: Invalid symlinks prevent building against the jdk

2014-08-29 Thread James McCoy
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 04:20:12AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 30.08.2014 um 04:14 schrieb James McCoy: > > Package: gcj-4.9-jdk > > Version: 4.9.1-9 > > Severity: serious > > > > Packages which use the JNI will FTBFS due to invalid symlinks in > > gcj-4.9-jdk > > Is there anything which pr

Bug#759765: gcj-4.9-jdk: Invalid symlinks prevent building against the jdk

2014-08-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 30.08.2014 um 04:14 schrieb James McCoy: > Package: gcj-4.9-jdk > Version: 4.9.1-9 > Severity: serious > > Packages which use the JNI will FTBFS due to invalid symlinks in > gcj-4.9-jdk Is there anything which prevents you to check the BTS for existing bug reports before filing duplicates? -

Bug#759765: gcj-4.9-jdk: Invalid symlinks prevent building against the jdk

2014-08-29 Thread James McCoy
Package: gcj-4.9-jdk Version: 4.9.1-9 Severity: serious Packages which use the JNI will FTBFS due to invalid symlinks in gcj-4.9-jdk: $ dpkg-deb -c gcj-4.9-jdk_4.9.1-9_amd64.deb | grep /build lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2014-08-24 22:16 ./usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/include/jawt.h ->

Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-29 Thread Gilles Filippini
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:30:56 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 28.08.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > > reassign 759558 gcj-4.9-jdk > > found 759558 gcc-4.9/4.9.1-9 > > thanks > > > > gcj-4.9-jdk isn't a source package, so the BTS seems a little confused > > about who to mail about this