Le 06/07/2014 19:45, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> maybe uploaded class files built with java8.
I don't think so, this would be caught by Lintian:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/incompatible-java-bytecode-format.html
Currently no package contains classes using the format 52 (Java 8).
Emmanuel Bou
On 07/06/2014 10:45 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 06.07.2014 19:06, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> Gabriele Giacone, le Sat 05 Jul 2014 03:41:09 +0200, a écrit :
>>> It FTBFS on hurd
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> cd /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc && /usr/bin/javadoc -quiet -d
>>> /home/user/port/sim
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 4 13:10:25 UTC 2014 (revision 212295)
Target: i586-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-10)
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++98 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 4 13:10:25 UTC 2014 (revision 212295)
Target: s390x-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-10)
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 4 13:10:25 UTC 2014 (revision 212295)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix
=== boehm-gc Summary ===
# of expected passes12
# of unsupported tests 1
Am 06.07.2014 19:06, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Gabriele Giacone, le Sat 05 Jul 2014 03:41:09 +0200, a écrit :
>> It FTBFS on hurd
>>
>> [...]
>> cd /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc && /usr/bin/javadoc -quiet -d
>> /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc/html/javadoc/
>> /home/user/p
Gabriele Giacone, le Sat 05 Jul 2014 03:41:09 +0200, a écrit :
> It FTBFS on hurd
>
> [...]
> cd /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc && /usr/bin/javadoc -quiet -d
> /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/doc/html/javadoc/
> /home/user/port/simgrid/simgrid-3.11.1/src/bindings/java/org/simg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 727621 gcc-4.8,gcc-4.9
Bug #727621 [gcc4.8,gcc4.9] armel: std::future appears to be broken?
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc4.8'
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc4.9'
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc4.8,gcc4.9' to 'gcc-4.8,gcc-4.9'.
Ignoring req
8 matches
Mail list logo