GCC source package format

Hello Debian GCC Maintainers! Why the old debian source package format (v1.0, with *.diff.gz) is still used for GCC? Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meidingerc1 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

gcc-4.8_4.8.3-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

=medium . * Update to SVN 20140626 (r212014) from the gcc-4_8-branch. . [ Aurelien Jarno ] * Fix PR c++/61336, taken from the trunk. . [ Matthias Klose ] * Fix removal of python byte-code files in libstdc++6. Addresses: #751435. * Fix a segfault in the driver from calling free on non

Processing of gcc-4.8_4.8.3-4_amd64.changes

gcc-4.8_4.8.3-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.8-source_4.8.3-4_all.deb gcj-4.8-jre-lib_4.8.3-4_all.deb gcj-4.8-source_4.8.3-4_all.deb libstdc++-4.8-doc_4.8.3-4_all.deb gcc-4.8-locales_4.8.3-4_all.deb gcc-4.8-base_4.8.3-4_amd64.deb libgcc-

Bug#752733: g++-4.9: PR61214 breaks packages linking against wxWidgets

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:34:41AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Wondering if we can have a work-around in wxwidgets-3.0, building without > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, until this is fixed in gcc-4.9. This way we would > have to touch only one package. At least the upstream test case works with i

Bug#752757: libstdc++6: shared printers.py script is different for ARMEL and ARMHF for the same package version

it is not, have missed #752579 somehow please close this one as duplicate On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:02:21 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: > how is this different than #752579? > > Am 26.06.2014 12:12, schrieb Igor Bogomazov: > > Package: libstdc++6 > > Version: 4.9.0-7 > > Severity: normal > > > > D

Bug#752757: libstdc++6: shared printers.py script is different for ARMEL and ARMHF for the same package version

how is this different than #752579? Am 26.06.2014 12:12, schrieb Igor Bogomazov: > Package: libstdc++6 > Version: 4.9.0-7 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > it is impossible to install the package for both armel and armhf because the > shared file is different in them: > > libstdc++6_4

Bug#752757: libstdc++6: shared printers.py script is different for ARMEL and ARMHF for the same package version

Package: libstdc++6 Version: 4.9.0-7 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, it is impossible to install the package for both armel and armhf because the shared file is different in them: libstdc++6_4.9.0-7_armel.deb libstdc++6_4.9.0-7_armhf.deb md5sum: 1b83b0b9896053a8206a076826e33de2 armel/usr/s

gcc-4.9_4.9.0-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:08:09 +0200 Source: gcc-4.9 Binary: gcc-4.9-base libgcc1 libgcc1-dbg libgcc2 libgcc2-dbg libgcc-4.9-dev libgcc4 libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc1 lib64gcc1-dbg lib64gcc-4.9-dev lib32gcc1 lib32gcc1-dbg lib32gcc-4

Bug#752733: g++-4.9: PR61214 breaks packages linking against wxWidgets

Am 26.06.2014 01:51, schrieb Michael Tautschnig: > Package: g++-4.9 Version: 4.9.0-7 Usertags: goto-cc Affects: hugin > mkvtoolnix Tags: upstream Forwarded: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 > > It seems that the problem known upstream as PR 61214 makes several Debian > package

Processing of gcc-4.9_4.9.0-8_amd64.changes

gcc-4.9_4.9.0-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.9-source_4.9.0-8_all.deb gcj-4.9-jre-lib_4.9.0-8_all.deb gcj-4.9-source_4.9.0-8_all.deb libgcj-doc_4.9.0-8_all.deb libstdc++-4.9-doc_4.9.0-8_all.deb gcc-4.9-locales_4.9.0-8_all.deb gcc-4.9-bas