I'm not sure that it would solve the issue, but shouldn't the dependency on
libjs-jquery introduced in revision 6620, be demoted to a suggestion? I don't
see a reason why I would want the library to read the documentation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 23 15:53:53 UTC 2014 (revision 209707)
Target: i586-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.10.0 20140423 (experimental) [trunk revision 209707] (Debian
20140423-1)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpec
Am 25.04.2014 16:54, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:37:38 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Please don't break GCC snapshot builds by not applying needed
>>> patches for the snapshot builds. At least the ppc64el build is
>>> broken, now fixed in the vcs.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:37:38 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
Please don't break GCC snapshot builds by not applying needed
patches for the snapshot builds. At least the ppc64el build is
broken, now fixed in the vcs. I didn't check other targets like,
arm, mips, the Hurd and
Matthias Klose wrote:
Please don't break GCC snapshot builds by not applying needed
patches for the snapshot builds. At least the ppc64el build is
broken, now fixed in the vcs. I didn't check other targets like,
arm, mips, the Hurd and KFreeBSD.
Could you please elaborate on what exactly caus
Please don't break GCC snapshot builds by not applying needed patches for the
snapshot builds. At least the ppc64el build is broken, now fixed in the vcs. I
didn't check other targets like, arm, mips, the Hurd and KFreeBSD.
Thanks, Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists
6 matches
Mail list logo
