Package: g++-4.4
Version: 4.4.5-8
Severity: normal
When compiling the following simple program:
#include
using namespace std;
int main()
{
for( int a = 0, b = 1; a >= 0 && b >= 0 ; ) {
cout << a << ", ";
int sum = a + b;
a = b;
Hi,
experimental now has gcc-4.8 packages. There are some things I would like to
see:
- a lot of patches from 4.6 still does apply. Please could you
evaluate these patches, and send these upstream if required?
would love to see these for 4.8.0 upstream.
- [CCing Eric for this] the gnatp
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
gcj-4.8_4.8-20121217-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.8_4.8-20121217-1.dsc
gcj-4.8_4.8-20121217.orig.tar.gz
gcj-4.8_4.8-20121217-1.diff.gz
gcj-4.8-jre-lib_4.8-20121217-1_all.deb
gcj-4.8-source_4.8-20121217-1_all.deb
libgcj-doc_4.8-20121217
Your message dated Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:57:46 -0800
with message-id <20121217225746.ga23...@math.sfu.ca>
and subject line Re: Bug#696058: gfortran: [gfortran] incorrect logic in -O2
old-style
has caused the Debian Bug report #696058,
regarding gfortran: [gfortran] incorrect logic in -O2 old-style l
lib64stdc++6-4.8-dbg libn32stdc++-4.8-dev libn32stdc++6-4.8-dbg
libx32stdc++-4.8-dev libx32stdc++6-4.8-dbg libstdc++-4.8-doc gcc-4.8-soft-float
fixincludes
gcc-4.8-source
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 4.8-20121217-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
gcc-4.8_4.8-20121217-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.8_4.8-20121217-1.dsc
gcc-4.8_4.8-20121217.orig.tar.gz
gcc-4.8_4.8-20121217-1.diff.gz
gcc-4.8-source_4.8-20121217-1_all.deb
libstdc++-4.8-doc_4.8-20121217-1_all.deb
gcc-4.8-locales_4.8
for GNU Objective-C applications (x32
development
libx32stdc++6-4.7-dbg - GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (debugging files)
libx32stdc++6-4.7-dev - GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development files)
Changes:
gcc-4.7 (4.7.2-15) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Update to SVN 20121217 (r194553) from the
gcc-4.7_4.7.2-15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.7_4.7.2-15.dsc
gcc-4.7_4.7.2-15.diff.gz
gcc-4.7-source_4.7.2-15_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.7-doc_4.7.2-15_all.deb
gcc-4.7-locales_4.7.2-15_all.deb
gcc-4.7-base_4.7.2-15_amd64.deb
libgcc-4.7-dev_4.7
Kevin Mitchell wrote:
Comparision logic fails between "wrapped around" integers inside an inverted
while loop hack. This occurs only on optimisation level 2 and if the
loop does not have an upper limit.
I encountered this when trying to emperically check the integer
limits. Attached is a small
On 12/17/2012 01:58 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Consider the attached patch: It does the same as the first patch but via
>> tm_file_list instead of tm_file as described above. (Applying to the
>> version in unstable, and with the experimental version there is
>> generally the same issue.)
>
> the
Am 16.12.2012 13:59, schrieb Kevin Mitchell:
> Package: gfortran
> Version: 4:4.7.2-1exp1
> Severity: normal
>
> Comparision logic fails between "wrapped around" integers inside an inverted
> while loop hack. This occurs only on optimisation level 2 and if the
> loop does not have an upper limit.
Am 15.12.2012 14:16, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 14/12/12 15:37, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h
>> is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and
>> default/v2.
>>
>> If you don't have another s
13 matches
Mail list logo
