Re: RFH: compile-time assertions now broken in GCC

2012-10-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit: >how does gcc-snapshot behave? It also introduces this failure. >If you think it's a regression, please could you forward it upstream? OK. In the meantime, I’ve prepared workarounds upstream (and made the code a bit less depending on -fwrapv), but I need to know whether I

Re: RFH: compile-time assertions now broken in GCC

2012-10-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 03.10.2012 15:59, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi, > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mksh/+bug/1058035 > was just the beginning, as gcc-snapshot in Debian had it (I > wrote that in the bugreport already), but, now, gcc-4.{6,7} > in sid also have it. > > I’ve just tracked it down for gc

Re: About maintenance of gcc-doc-defaults, gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc

2012-10-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04.10.2012 07:00, Guo Yixuan wrote: > Dear GCC Maintainers, > > I'm working on updating gcc's documents, that is to upload 4 packages. > gcc-4.6-doc and gcc-4.7-doc already reached sid, with Samuel as maintainer, me > as uploader, by Steffen's sponsoring. > > For gcc-doc-defaults[3] and gcc-4.

Bug#684082: gcc-doc: update to gcc 4.7

2012-10-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-08-06 21:32:53 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Please package gcc-4.7-doc and update gcc-doc to point to it. Now that gcc-4.7-doc is available, the only thing to do is to update gcc-doc to point to it. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML -