LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-2)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/build/b
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-2)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/build/bui
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-1)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/build/bui
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:35:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.09.2012 16:24, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> >>> Ok, to say it in other words:
> >>>
On 24.09.2012 16:24, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>>> Ok, to say it in other words:
>>>
>>>experimentally, a plugin which calls fatal_error (and this is defin
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Ok, to say it in other words:
> >
> >experimentally, a plugin which calls fatal_error (and this is definitely
> > an
> >acceptable behavior for plugin
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Ok, to say it in other words:
>
>experimentally, a plugin which calls fatal_error (and this is definitely an
>acceptable behavior for plugins) makes Debian GCC output the original
> message,
>which is very confusi
On 24.09.2012 14:10, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:49:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 24.09.2012 13:27, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
>>> suggestion.
>>>
>>> The message
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:49:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.09.2012 13:27, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
> > suggestion.
> >
> > The message
> > The bug is not reproducible, so it is like
On 24.09.2012 13:27, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
> suggestion.
>
> The message
> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem
> is apparently Debian specific http://gcc.gnu.org/m
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
> I suggest to replace it with
>
>The bug is not reproducible, so it could be a plugin, hardware or OS
> problem
slight update :
The bug is not reproducible, so it could be an external problem :
A plugin, hardware or OS problem
--
Hello All,
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
suggestion.
The message
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem
is apparently Debian specific http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00234.html
But it is very confusing, since plug
12 matches
Mail list logo