I just discovered that I always wanted to have an internet relationship. Could you take part?

2012-08-14 Thread Sharyn Rosenzweig
What's up pretty! I am Sharyn. I've been searching all over the world for real love, maybe it is you?!;) So, let's see what'll happen )) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://

Re: ppl_0.11.2-8_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-08-14 Thread Matthias Klose
On 14.08.2012 16:00, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > Hi, > > Replaces field is not correct: > Replaces: lbppl0.11-dev (<< 0.11.2-8~) > ^^^ > Correct library name should be libppl0.11-dev ok > I think it lacks a Breaks: libppl0.11-dev (<< 0.11.2-8~) field too. no. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

ppl_0.11.2-8_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-08-14 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi, Replaces field is not correct: Replaces: lbppl0.11-dev (<< 0.11.2-8~) ^^^ Correct library name should be libppl0.11-dev I think it lacks a Breaks: libppl0.11-dev (<< 0.11.2-8~) field too. Cheers, Luca === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your f

Bug#684716: Bug#678525: GCC bug

2012-08-14 Thread Rahul Amaram
James, thanks for pointing out this. You are right. Using Py_ssize_t* instead of int* has indeed fixed the problem. We somehow were misguided reg. the problem. Thanks once again for taking the time to look into this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subjec

Bug#684716: marked as done (gcc-4.7: problem with local variables, works in gcc-4.6)

2012-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:19:56 +0200 with message-id <502a183c.2050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#684716: Bug#678525: GCC bug has caused the Debian Bug report #684716, regarding gcc-4.7: problem with local variables, works in gcc-4.6 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Processed: reassign 667341 to gcc-4.7, severity of 667341 is important

2012-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 667341 gcc-4.7 Bug #667341 [src:qmf] gcc-4.7 can omit to list C++ templates as symbols Bug reassigned from package 'src:qmf' to 'gcc-4.7'. No longer marked as found in versions qmf/1.0.7~2011w23.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versio

Processed: reassign 684812 to src:qmf, severity of 684812 is serious

2012-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 684812 src:qmf qmf/1.0.7~2011w23.2-2 Bug #684812 [gcc-4.7] qmf: FTBFS: messageserver.cpp:473:5: error: '::write' has not been declared Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.7' to 'src:qmf'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #6

Re: Comments regarding ppl_0.11.2-8_amd64.changes

2012-08-14 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.08.2012 18:39, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > what's the rationale behind this package split? > It's targeted unstable, has it been discussed with Release Team first? it's fixing a regression introduced by the recent NMUs, and makes the -dev package Multi-Arch: same again. -- To UNSUBSC

Processed: unmerging 684812, reassign 684812 to gcc-4.7, severity of 684812 is important

2012-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 684812 Bug #684812 [src:qmf] qmf: FTBFS: messageserver.cpp:473:5: error: '::write' has not been declared Bug #667341 [src:qmf] gcc-4.7 can omit to list C++ templates as symbols Disconnected #684812 from all other report(s). > reassign 684

Processed: reassign 667341 to src:qmf, severity of 667341 is serious, forcibly merging 667341 684812

2012-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 667341 src:qmf qmf/1.0.7~2011w23.2-2 Bug #667341 [gcc-4.7] gcc-4.7 can omit to list C++ templates as symbols Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.7' to 'src:qmf'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #667341 to the same values p