Seems to be fixed in 4.7.0-4.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp945bdb49911896134e848497...@p
Package: libgcj-bc
Version: 4.7.0-3
Severity: normal
Unpacking replacement libgcj-bc:hppa ...
Preparing to replace libgcj-common 1:4.6.3-3 (using
libgcj-common_4.6.3-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libgcj-common ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgcj-bc:hppa:
libgcj-b
Accepted:
cpp_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
g++_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.116exp1.dsc
to main/
Accepted:
cpp_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
g++_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.116.dsc
to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_
gcc-defaults_1.116exp1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.116exp1.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.116exp1.tar.gz
libgcj-common_4.6.3-4exp1_all.deb
cpp_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
gcc_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
gcc-multilib_4.7.0-4exp1_amd64.deb
gdc_4.6.3-4ex
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:37:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#666437: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.116
has caused the Debian Bug report #666437,
regarding libgcj-bc: Uninstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
gcc-defaults_1.116_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.116.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.116.tar.gz
libgcj-common_4.6.3-4_all.deb
cpp_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
gcc_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
gcc-multilib_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
gdc_4.6.3-4_amd64.deb
gdc-v1_4.6.3-4_am
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:09:52AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 666743 + wontfix
> thanks
Did you forget to cc control@?
> looks like an april fool joke. If not, then it's won't fix. upstream
> did explicitly remove the ability to specify the triplet/target and
> the version from the drive
tags 666743 + wontfix
thanks
On 01.04.2012 15:47, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> [...]
looks like an april fool joke. If not, then it's won't fix. upstream did
explicitly remove the ability to specify the triplet/target and the version from
the driver.
Either get this kind of thing implemented upstr
9 matches
Mail list logo