On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
> from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
> found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
> package?
Su
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from
unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in
experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package?
Matthias
On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Dear GC
On 12/01/12 10:56, Michael Cree wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.6
> Version: 4.6.2-11
>
> git_1:1.7.8.3-1 FTBFS because of incorrect code generation by gcc-4.6.
This is now PR 51994.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lis
Dear GCC Maintainers,
Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson
Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 21 19:13:33 UTC 2012 (revision 183370)
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.0 20120121 (experimental) [trunk revision 183370] (Debian
4.7-20120121-1)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_p
clone 652160 -1
retitle -1 add lintian warnings about -gdb.py files in /usr/lib
reassign -1 lintian
clone 652160 -2
retitle -2 ldconfig should not complain about -gdb.py not being elf files
reassign -2 src:eglibc
thanks
the location of the -gdb.py files is one thing, but ldconfig should not warn
6 matches
Mail list logo
