On 11/20/2011 01:08 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have
>> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors
>> and now require a minimum of a 4
On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have
> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors
> and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor.
>
> I think it is time to increase the minimum requi
On 11/22/2011 07:27 PM, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> Package: gdc-4.4
> Version: 1.063-4.4.6-7
> Severity: important
>
> Any invocation of the gdc-4.4 compiler prints a multilib-relted warning:
>
> cc1d: warning: command line option "-imultilib" is valid for
> C/C++/Fortran/ObjC/ObjC++ but not f
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"):
> > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are:
> > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486'
>
> I'm still running the machine below, and it woul
Package: gdc-4.4
Version: 1.063-4.4.6-7
Severity: important
Any invocation of the gdc-4.4 compiler prints a multilib-relted warning:
cc1d: warning: command line option "-imultilib" is valid for
C/C++/Fortran/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for D
This is rather annoying and hides useful compiler warnings
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 22 novembre 2011, vers 18:28,
Bastian Blank disait :
>> > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are:
>> > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486'
>> I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to
>> have
Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"):
> The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are:
> 1. All x86 processors with names including '486'
I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to
have to replace it.
Perhaps a better approach would
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"):
> > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are:
> > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486'
> I'm still running the machine below, and it would b
Accepted:
cpp-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.6/cpp-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.6/fixincludes_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
g++-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4
gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5.dsc
gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5.diff.gz
gcc-4.6-source_4.6.2-5_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.6-doc_4.6.2-5_all.deb
gcc-4.6-locales_4.6.2-5_all.deb
gcc-4.6-base_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
libgcc1_4.6.2-5_i386.deb
10 matches
Mail list logo
