On Nov 02, 2011, at 17:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 04:09 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
>> on "powerpcspe" with that patch. It turns out gcj needs to build
>> an embedded copy of libffi (is that OK under De
On 11/02/2011 04:09 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
> on "powerpcspe" with that patch. It turns out gcj needs to build
> an embedded copy of libffi (is that OK under Debian policy?), so
> I also had to apply the new libffi p
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.108
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: powerpcspe
Please add the unofficial Debian port "powerpcspe" to the list of
GCC-4.6 architectures in the "gcc-defaults" package.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Curious about my work on the Debian pow
Hello,
I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
on "powerpcspe" with that patch. It turns out gcj needs to build
an embedded copy of libffi (is that OK under Debian policy?), so
I also had to apply the new libffi patch in #647288 [1].
This patch modifies a case conditiona
Package: g++-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
while preparing the next upload for the qpid package, I've stumbled
over
a changed behaviour in handling unused results.
The code that is rising errors:
(void) ::lockf(f, F_ULOCK, 0);
If I change it to some construct lik
5 matches
Mail list logo
