Bug#630441: g++-4.6 miscompilation

2011-09-22 Thread Philip Ashmore
I'll work on trying to put together a simpler test case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7bae3a.9070...@philipashmore.com

Bug#642413: [gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.

2011-09-22 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
(2011-09-22 23:19 +0200), Matthias Klose wrote: > On 09/22/2011 02:56 PM, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote: >> Package: gcc-4.6 >> Version: 4.6.1-11 >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: patch >> >> Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too, not >> only Ubuntu. >> When an attached pat

Bug#642413: [gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.

2011-09-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09/22/2011 02:56 PM, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote: > Package: gcc-4.6 > Version: 4.6.1-11 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too, not > only Ubuntu. > When an attached patch is applied, it is confirmed that the package can be >

Bug#642413: [gcc-4.6] Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too.

2011-09-22 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-11 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please adopt the patches of ibm-branch.diff etc. on Debian ppc64, too, not only Ubuntu. When an attached patch is applied, it is confirmed that the package can be built. -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59

Bug#638418: Wine compile problems

2011-09-22 Thread DarkPhoenix
This bug also affects Wine from winehq.org source: configure scripts can't detect sound system (ALSA) and several other libraries properly. Linking asm folder to arch-specific directory with actual header resolves issue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Bug#630441: g++-4.6 miscompilation

2011-09-22 Thread Miles Bader
Philip Ashmore writes: > It appears that gcc-4.6 (and clang for that matter) make some dodgy > decisions about what appear to be references to temporaries created > during optimization. You don't seem to have addressed the issue raised by Matthias Klose in the bug thread though: specifically, wh