Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Enter
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:14:25 +0200
with message-id <4e2469f1.8020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#634200: #634200 gcc -Wall -Werror -lncurses fails to
link wide-character ncursesw functions.
has caused the Debian Bug report #634200,
regarding gcc -Wall -Werror -lncurses fai
On 07/18/2011 04:39 PM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>> plus, your example will fail when using -Wl,--as-needed. move the
> library behind
>> the objects.
>
> Okay... The synopsis of gcc in the man page says the file to be
> compiled should come last in the compile line. That's the only thing
> I can se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2011 02:31 AM, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Ray Dillinger writes:
>
>> display.c starts with the lines:
>>
>>
>> #define _X_OPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
>
> There is an extra underscore after the X.
> Correcting that fixes the implicit-declaratio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> bear@janus:~/src/xxh$ make display.o
>> gcc -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -Wall -Werror -lncursesw -c -o display.o \
>> display.c
>> bear@janus:~/src/xxh$
>
> should't the ncursesw headers be used?
Sorry, don't understand your message. The ncursesw head
Ray Dillinger writes:
> display.c starts with the lines:
>
>
> #define _X_OPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
There is an extra underscore after the X.
Correcting that fixes the implicit-declaration error for me.
Also, for consistency with other uses of this macro, it would be
best to define it with the value
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 07/18/2011 07:35 AM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
On 07/17/2011 05:10 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
You're seeing implicit for get_wch, since there's no _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
in the compile line.
Okay, after checking:
bear@janus:~/src/xxh$ make display.o
g
On 07/18/2011 07:35 AM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 05:10 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>> You're seeing implicit for get_wch, since there's no _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
>> in the compile line.
>
> Okay, after checking:
>
> bear@janus:~/src/xxh$ make display.o
> gcc -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Ray Dillinger wrote:
On 07/17/2011 05:10 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
fwiw, I routinely build with warnings enabled (and don't have a use for
-Werror).
For the rest - I'm typically seeing only extra warnings that
you wouldn't see with -Wall (such as const mismatches, which are
9 matches
Mail list logo
