ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes is NEW

2011-01-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libppl-c2_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb to main/p/ppl0.10/libppl-c2_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl0.10-dev_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb to main/p/ppl0.10/libppl0.10-dev_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl7_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb to main/p/ppl0.10/libppl7_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb (new) ppl0.10_0.10.2-10.debian.tar.gz optional libs (

Processing of ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes

2011-01-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ppl0.10_0.10.2-10.dsc ppl0.10_0.10.2.orig.tar.gz ppl0.10_0.10.2-10.debian.tar.gz libppl7_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl0.10-dev_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl-c2_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb Greetings, You

ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-01-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Reject Reasons: no source found for ppl0.10 0.10.2-10 (libppl0.10-dev_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb). no source found for ppl0.10 0.10.2-10 (libppl-c2_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb). no source found for ppl0.10 0.10.2-10 (libppl7_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb). === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't u

Processing of ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes

2011-01-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ppl0.10_0.10.2-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libppl7_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl0.10-dev_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb libppl-c2_0.10.2-10_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#608550: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Re:

2011-01-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:34:02PM +0100, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > Hi ... (disagree, for flaw in reasoning about bne). > > "Also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System:" > > > With compile options > > > > > > -O0 -static -DMIPS -mips1 -mabi=32 -msoft-float -mno-memcpy > > > > > > gcc produces inc

Bug#608550: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Re:

2011-01-01 Thread Julien BLACHE
"Peter T. Breuer" wrote: Hi, >> * if v1 is equal to 0, the following sequence is executed: >> bne $3,$0,1f >> div $0,$2,$3 >> break 7 > > Yes. The branch fails, and falls through to the division, which (fails > and) traps in the break following. I think you're getting confused b

Bug#608550: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Re:

2011-01-01 Thread Peter T. Breuer
Hi ... (disagree, for flaw in reasoning about bne). "Also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System:" > > With compile options > > > > -O0 -static -DMIPS -mips1 -mabi=32 -msoft-float -mno-memcpy > > > > gcc produces incorrect code for division (and I suppose, %) from C. > > > > Test code can be sim

Bug#608550: marked as done (gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu: gcc produces incorrect assembler for a/b - it doesn't do anything.)

2011-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jan 2011 14:27:43 +0100 with message-id <20110101132743.gk3...@hall.aurel32.net> and subject line Re: Bug#608550: gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu: gcc produces incorrect assembler for a/b - it doesn't do anything. has caused the Debian Bug report #608550, regarding gcc-4.3-mips-li

Processed: Re: Bug#608550: gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu: gcc produces incorrect assembler for a/b - it doesn't do anything.

2011-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 608550 gcc-4.3 Bug #608550 [gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu] gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu: gcc produces incorrect assembler for a/b - it doesn't do anything. Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-4.3-mips-linux-gnu' Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.3-mips-li