CCing Kees Cook, he has been the one leading the efforts up to now. I hope
he can answer your queries.
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> There are a couple of things here that should be worked out first
> before the CTTE can make a decision:
>
> 1) Has gcc's upstream been approach
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I think none of the discussions up to now have resulted in a
> consensus among all the parties. Most people are in favor of
> changing the defaults in GCC, except the gcc maintainer.
There are a couple of things here that should be worked out first
bef
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.96
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
[[ blog excerpt ]]
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs -i
dh_installdocs -plibgcj-common
dh_installchangelogs -plibgcj-common
mv deb
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20101016-1_hppa.deb
to main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20101016-1_hppa.deb
Override entries for your package:
gcc-snapshot_20101016-1_hppa.deb - extra devel
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.or
gcc-snapshot_20101016-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20101016-1_hppa.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
dave b wrote:
> On 21 November 2010 02:45, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Also, I am not the GCC maintainer, but from experience of receiving
>> reports from people building software with Ubuntu, I think changing
>> the defaults in GCC is quite wrong.
>
> Why do you think this?
Well, I should scale t
On 21 November 2010 02:45, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> We have dpkg-buildflags available but few packages are using it and it's
>> unlikely they will be all converted in the wheezy timeframe.
>
> I agree with the precise meaning of this statement, but the spirit se
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> We have dpkg-buildflags available but few packages are using it and it's
> unlikely they will be all converted in the wheezy timeframe.
I agree with the precise meaning of this statement, but the spirit seems
quite wrong. For the packages I am involved in (not many)
reassign 552688 tech-ctte
retitle 552688 Please decide how Debian should enable hardening build flags
tag 552688 - wontfix
thanks
I think none of the discussions up to now have resulted in a consensus
among all the parties. Most people are in favor of changing the defaults
in GCC, except the gcc m
9 matches
Mail list logo