Accepted:
gcj-4.5-base_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.5/gcj-4.5-base_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
gcj-4.5-jdk_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.5/gcj-4.5-jdk_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
gcj-4.5-jre-headless_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcj-4.5/gcj-4.5-jre-headless_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
gcj-4.5-jre-lib_4.5.1-8_al
gcj-4.5_4.5.1-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.5_4.5.1-8.dsc
gcj-4.5_4.5.1-8.diff.gz
gcj-4.5-jre-lib_4.5.1-8_all.deb
gcj-4.5-source_4.5.1-8_all.deb
libgcj-doc_4.5.1-8_all.deb
gcj-4.5-base_4.5.1-8_amd64.deb
gcj-4.5-jre-headless_4.5.1-8_amd6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # 51 and 57 are instances of 566234.
> forcemerge 566234 51 57
Bug#566234: [mips only] /usr/lib/libgnarl-4.4.so: undefined reference to
`__gnat_alternate_stack'
Bug#51: topal: FTBFS on mips: undefined reference to
`__gnat_al
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Duh, try and do it properly this time.
> # Sorry for generating spurious emails.
> # 566234 affects topal and adasockets, causing FTBFS on mips.
> # I could set this for other maintainers, but I'll let each make their
> # own decision.
> affects
Hi,
Phil Brooke (12/10/2010):
> Thanks for the reports. It's a known problem with the compiler, not
> topal and adasockets.
yeah, I suspected something like that when I noticed there were
similar-looking bugs. Maybe use a blocked-by as documentation?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Di
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # 566234 affects topal and adasockets, causing FTBFS on mips.
> # I could set this for other maintainers, but I'll let each make their
> # own decision.
> affects 566234 topal
Bug #566234 [gnat-4.4] [mips only] /usr/lib/libgnarl-4.4.so: undefined
Matthias Klose (12/10/2010):
> Version: 4.5.1-8
Alright. Where is that package? I don't see anything in incoming or in
NEW. Not that I care, just curious.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Target: x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes1894
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-3)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 11:00:14 UTC 2010 (revision 165300)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes2476
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:10:20 +0200
with message-id <4cb4967c@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599976: gcj-4.5: FTBFS on mips*: dpkg-gencontrol:
error: package gobjc++-4.5-multilib not in control info
has caused the Debian Bug report #599976,
regarding gcj-4.5: FTBFS on mips
Source: gcj-4.5
Version: 4.5.1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
your package FTBFS on mips*:
| dh_shlibdeps -pgobjc++-4.5-multilib
| dh_gencontrol -pgobjc++-4.5-multilib -- -v4.5.1-3 '-Vgcc:Version=4.5.1-1~'
'-Vgcc:EpochVersion=1:4.5.1-3' '-Vgcc:SoftVersion=4.5.1-1~' '-Vgpc:Version='
'-Vgdc:Version='
I sent a followup to a bug I had filed (#599572), and got the following
two emails in rapid succession.
I don't know how the forwarding for the gcc-snapshot package is
setup, but surely it's Not Good for bug reports to be sent to a
only-subscribers-can-post mailing list...?
Thanks,
-Miles
(1)
16 matches
Mail list logo