On Sunday 13 September 2009 10:01:55 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What is the package that provides the java alternative with the
> rmiregistry slave ?
From looking at the output of
update-alternatives --query java
it appears to be this alternative that is causing the problem:
Alternative: /usr/bi
Accepted:
gnat-4.4-base_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4-base_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.diff.gz
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.dsc
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/g
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.dsc
gnat-4.4_4.4.1-5.diff.gz
gnat-4.4-base_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
libgnat-4.4_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
libgnatvsn4.4-dev_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
libgnatvsn4.4_4.4.1-5_amd64.deb
libgnatprj4.4-dev_4.4
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_1_release revision 149916
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.1 (Debian 4.4.1-4)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected pas
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_1_release revision 149916
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.31.5.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.31.5.f
FYI: The status of the gnat-4.4 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.4.1-1
Current version: 4.4.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
When we compiled it for sh4 in the current gcc-4.3 source code,
/usr/include/sh4-linux-gnu is not included in a search pass of include
file.
The other architecture is included.
sh4:
$ cpp-4.3 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sh4-linux-gn
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Graham Cobb wrote:
> On Friday 11 September 2009 14:24:49 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > the only "fix" I can think of would be adding conflicts to every
> > > package listing rmiregistry et al as a slave alternative. But I
> > > don
8 matches
Mail list logo