--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-17 00:56 ---
I believe the problem is the symbol was exported when it shouldn't have been.
The signbit macro is provided by math.h.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
--- You are receiving this mail be
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-17
00:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++
not exported anymore
> Bloody hack but will probably work
Long double on hppa-linux is the same as double (64 bits).
Dave
--
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gcc-4.3_4.3.3-8 on mayr by sbuild/mips 99.999
> Build started at 20090416-1609
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depen
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 23:09 ---
There is no __signbitl export expected, from
config/abi/post/hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt. Where is this from?
Assume this would result in an abi_check FAIL?
FYI
gcc-4.4 hppa-linux results are fine:
http://gc
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 22:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=17649)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17649&action=view)
adds __signbitl for hppa
Bloody hack but will probably work
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 22:12 ---
Mine
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 6 10:57:48 UTC 2009 (revision 145586)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c/autopar-1.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/threadprivate3.f90 -O3 -fomit-fram
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#491115: fixed in gcc-4.3 4.3.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #491115,
regarding [PR middle-end/38360, Fixed in 4.4] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:1636
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523040: fixed in gcc-4.3 4.3.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #523040,
regarding gcc-4.3: error: unrecognizable insn on alpha using -O3 and -std=c99
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523869: fixed in gcc-4.3 4.3.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #523869,
regarding libffi-dev: gcc doesn't find ffi.h
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523655: fixed in gcc-4.3 4.3.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #523655,
regarding gcc-4.3: error: unrecognizable insn on alpha using -O3 and -std=c99
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Accepted:
cpp-4.3_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/cpp-4.3_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/fixincludes_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
g++-4.3-multilib_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/g++-4.3-multilib_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
g++-4.3_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
to pool/ma
gcc-4.3_4.3.3-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.3_4.3.3-8.dsc
gcc-4.3_4.3.3-8.diff.gz
gcc-4.3-source_4.3.3-8_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.3-doc_4.3.3-8_all.deb
gcc-4.3-locales_4.3.3-8_all.deb
gcc-4.3-base_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
libgcc1_4.3.3-8_i386.deb
Hi GCC-Maintainers,
I wonder why there are both gcc-snapshot and gcc-4.4 packages in the
Debian archive. I mean, as long as gcc-4.4 isn't officially released,
the gcc-snapshot package actually contains a snapshot of gcc-4.4, and
so does the gcc-4.4 package. Wouldn't it be sufficient to make th
14 matches
Mail list logo
