Bug#95318: Spam: Re: Lists of MDs and Dentists

2009-04-10 Thread Ernesto Langford
Special Package for this week Certified Physicians in the USA 788,044 in total * 17,508 emails Physician in over 34 specialties Can easily be sorted by 16 different fields Contact List of US Pharma Companies 47,000 personal emails and names of decision makers American Hospital List 23,000 A

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 10 avril 2009 à 14:35 +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit : > At least with a strict interpretation, the run-time exception suffers > from a significant issue with compilers which are not licensed under a > GPLv3-compatible license (such as the GPLv2, or the QPL), and which > are implemented

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 10-04-2009, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sylvain Le Gall: > >>> byterun/ints.c, function caml_int64_div, the I64_div macro. This is >>> expanded into a plain division operator, and that is compiled into a >>> run-time library call by GCC. >>> >> >> I64_div is a function defined either in byterun/

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Sylvain Le Gall: >> byterun/ints.c, function caml_int64_div, the I64_div macro. This is >> expanded into a plain division operator, and that is compiled into a >> run-time library call by GCC. >> > > I64_div is a function defined either in byterun/int64_emul.h o > byterun/int64_native.h. Readin

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 10-04-2009, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sylvain Le Gall: > >>> But in Debian, we compile with GCC. And for the Int64 module, >>> functionality from libgcc2.c gets compiled into the binary. (This is >>> just the example I've verified.) > >> Int64 module is under LGPL + static link exception (and

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Sylvain Le Gall: >> But in Debian, we compile with GCC. And for the Int64 module, >> functionality from libgcc2.c gets compiled into the binary. (This is >> just the example I've verified.) > Int64 module is under LGPL + static link exception (and everything > related to runtime library). Doe

Bug#523509: gcj-4.3: FTBFS with libtool 2.2

2009-04-10 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: gcj-4.3 Version: 4.3.3-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log (using gcc-4.3-source version 4.3.3-7): ... Making all in native make[6]: Entering directory `/tmp/gcj-4.3/gcj-4.3-4.3.3/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/native' Making all in fdlibm make[7]: Entering director

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 10-04-2009, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Stéphane Glondu: > >> * The runtime (ocamlrun) is a pure C program, that can be compiled with >>any C compiler. Customized runtimes (with functions implemented in C) >>can be generated; in this case, a C file might be generated by >>ocamlc{,.op

Processed: once more with proper syntax

2009-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # guess based on upload dates vs build dates > fixed 484741 gcc-4.3/4.3.2-3 Bug#484741: g++-4.3: [ia64] exceptions are not caught when they should be Bug marked as fixed in version gcc-4.3/4.3.2-3. > # wasn't in the change log > fixed 522995 0.43

Bug#484741: marked as done (g++-4.3: [ia64] exceptions are not caught when they should be)

2009-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:27:40 -0700 with message-id and subject line closing these out has caused the Debian Bug report #484741, regarding g++-4.3: [ia64] exceptions are not caught when they should be to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Stéphane Glondu: > * The runtime (ocamlrun) is a pure C program, that can be compiled with >any C compiler. Customized runtimes (with functions implemented in C) >can be generated; in this case, a C file might be generated by >ocamlc{,.opt}, and this file is handled the same way as

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Florian Weimer a écrit : > Starting with version 4.4, the FSF the licenses the GCC run-time > library with a special exception: [...] A few precisions: * OCaml doesn't depend on any GCC-specific feature. It works with any C compiler. * There are 4 compilers for Objective Caml: - ocamlc,

How To Get A Girl To Do Anything And Everything In Bedd

2009-04-10 Thread Boni
Matters. Tom was not slow to perceive this, and we should not have asked for what you have given. How To Get A Girl To Do Anythingg And Everything In Bed - Be Absolutely Mind Blowing Invisible, but there was a glare of yellow at violate the beds of

GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers

2009-04-10 Thread Florian Weimer
Starting with version 4.4, the FSF the licenses the GCC run-time library with a special exception: | Under Section 7 of GPL version 3, you are granted additional | permissions described in the GCC Runtime Library Exception, version | 3.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation. The exceptio