Bug#487195: gcc-doc-defaults: Should depends on gcc-4.3-doc?

2008-06-19 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Package: gcc-doc-defaults Severity: minor Hi! As gcc-4.3 is now the default version (with the "gcc" package depending on it), shouldn't gcc-doc (that depends on gcc-4.2-doc) be updated to gcc-4.3-doc? Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefer

Bug#473647: gcc-3.4: no g77

2008-06-19 Thread Alan W. Irwin
I agree with the original bug reporter. My use case is I have some large legacy fortran code which works fine under g77, but which gives bad numerical results under gfortran. To debug the issues I have to compare the two results in detail, and I cannot do that now that the gcc packagers have dec

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #478886 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32809 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED forwarded 478886 http://gc

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #484053 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36415 # * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED usertags 484053 + statu

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: bug 487115 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36533

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29 > forwarded 487115 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36533 Bug#487115: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.1 cannot be used to compile the Linux kernel (bad code generation) Noted your stateme

Processed: tagging 487115

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29 > tags 487115 + upstream Bug#487115: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.1 cannot be used to compile the Linux kernel (bad code generation) There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > End of message

Bug#487115: gcc-4.3: gcc 4.3.1 cannot be used to compile the Linux kernel (bad code generation)

2008-06-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: gcc-4.3 Version: 4.3.1-2 Severity: important gcc-4.3.1 miscompiles Linux ext3 code in some targets, causing OOPSes. It could be causing other problems elsewhere in the kernel, too. More information: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451068 Bug caused by (extracted from RedHat

Bug#487109: gdc-4.2: Please upgrade to 4.2.4-1

2008-06-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: gdc-4.2 Version: 4.2.3-1 Severity: wishlist Hello, gcc-4.2 upgraded to 4.2.4-1, could you do the same for gdc? That would actually fix bug 482519. It would also permit to install gdc on hurd-i386: for now gcc-defaults' gdc depends on gdc-4.2 (>= 4.2.4-1) there. Samuel -- System Infor

Processed: no patch for gcc available

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 369064 - patch Bug#369064: gcc: please add support for multiarch Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#487075: warning: will never be executed

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 487075 libstdc++6-4.1-dev Bug#487075: warning: will never be executed Warning: Unknown package 'in' Warning: Unknown package 'etch' Warning: Unknown package 'of' Warning: Unknown package 'architecture' Warning: Unknown package 'i386' Bug reassi

Bug#487078: warning: will never be executed

2008-06-19 Thread Valerij Rozouvan
Package: libstdc++6 Version: 4.1.1-21 When compiling programs which use "/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/bits/streambuf_iterator.h" with gcc, and including the flag "-Wunreachable-code", the compiler informs me that the header file contains unreachable code. Now I know this is not an "error", but maybe

Bug#487076: gcc-4.3-doc: "info gcc" gives the manual of gcc 3.3 (gcc-3.3.info) instead of the current version

2008-06-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: gcc-4.3-doc Version: 4.3.0.nf1-1 Severity: normal When I type "info gcc", I get the manual of gcc 3.3: File: gcc-3.3.info, Node: Top, Next: G++ and GCC, Up: (DIR) whereas I expect to get the manual of gcc 4.3 (which is the version of /usr/bin/gcc, in fact 4.3.1 whereas the manual is

Bug#487075: warning: will never be executed

2008-06-19 Thread Valerij Rozouvan
Package: libstdc++6-4.1-dev in etch of architecture i386 When compiling programs which use "/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/bits/streambuf_iterator.h" with gcc, and including the flag "-Wunreachable-code", the compiler informs me that the header file contains unreachable code. Now I know this is not an

reassign 369064 to gcc-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 reassign 369064 gcc-4.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 369064 to gcc-4.3

2008-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 > reassign 369064 gcc-4.3 Bug#369064: gcc: please add support for multiarch Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `gcc-4.3'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co