the gcc-4.2 multilib is installed,
Package: gcc-multilib
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 20
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Architecture: amd64
Source: gcc-defaults (1.69)
Version: 4:4.2.3-7
but it seems this is not good
because above I found
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461101: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.70
has caused the Debian Bug report #461101,
regarding gdc should not be built on sparc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475365: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.70
has caused the Debian Bug report #475365,
regarding gcc-defaults: make gnat-4.3 the default on all remaining architectures
to be marked as done.
This mean
Accepted:
cpp_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
g++_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.70.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-defau
gcc-defaults_1.70_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.70.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.70.tar.gz
cpp_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
gcc_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
gcc-multilib_4.2.3-8_amd64.deb
gnat_4.3.0-5_amd64.deb
libgnatvsn-dev_4.3.0-5_amd64.deb
libgnatprj-dev_4
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:28:56AM +0200, Friedrich wrote:
> gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searching for -lgcc_s
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc_s.so when searchin
Hi Alexei!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Alexei Sheplyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to trace this bug down and figure out if it's a bug in gcc, or
> > somewhere else.
>
> I don't think it's a bug. Rather, it's a wrong expectation from the user
> side.
> You are compar
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.3-3
Severity: normal
See the following code:
#include
int main (void){
puts ("Hallo Welt");
return 0;
}
compiling with gcc-4.2 (in 64-bit mode gives no error and just runs)
hello% gcc-4.2 hello.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/programming/C/hello% ./a.out
Hallo Welt
B
9 matches
Mail list logo