On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Another gcc problem report:
>
> That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from
> Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels
> booted but the networking only worked for gcc-4.1 kernel.
Fol
--- Comment #16 from rusty at rustcorp dot com dot au 2008-03-28 02:38
---
OK, this is fixed in gcc 4.3 (woot!), but the unused "funk" is still omitted.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35728
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- You are recei
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #440287
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34815
# * remote status changed: WAITING -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 22 11:59:05 UTC 2008 (revision 133447)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TestClosureGC run
FAIL:
/build/buildd/gcj-4.2-4.2.3/src/libjava/testsuite/libjava.jar/TestClosureGC.jar
execution - gij
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 22 11:59:05 UTC 2008 (revision 133447)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1389
# of unsupported tests 10
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.1 20080321 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-2)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes17430
# of expected failures
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
F
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 22 11:59:05 UTC 2008 (revision 133447)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 22 11:59:05 UTC 2008 (revision 133447)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1389
# of unsupported tests 10
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35090
--- You
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 22:18 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 22:09 ---
As suggested. Please re-open only with a proper testcase.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.0.3 4.1.1 4.2.0 |4.0.3 4.0.4 4.1.1 4.2.0
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] i
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE|[4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in
|in gimplify_expr, at
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.0.4
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.0.4
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 3.2.3 |3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 4.0.4
|
Hi!
This bug is also triggered on mipsel architecture.
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Source: gcc-3.3
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gdc-4.2
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gnat-4.3
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debi
Source: gpc-4.1
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcj-4.3
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gnat-4.2
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debi
Source: gcc-snapshot
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to
Source: gcc-4.3
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcc-3.4
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gdc-4.1
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcj-4.1
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcc-4.0
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcc-4.1
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gnat-4.1
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debi
Source: gcc-4.2
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
Source: gcj-4.2
Severity: important
Hi!
Your package currently build-depend on expect-tcl8.3 which in turn
depends on tcl8.3.
Debian Tcl/Tk packaging team is about to remove tcl8.3 (and tk8.3)
from Debian because it's really outdated (more than five years) and
imposes unnecessary burden to Debia
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Another gcc problem report:
> >
> > That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from
> > Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels
> > booted but the networking only worked for gcc-4.1
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:42:44PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have tried to build the glibc with GCC 4.3 on hppa, and rpcgen
> > segfaults when it is used, so the build fails. I haven't start to
> > investigate
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Another gcc problem report:
>
> That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from
> Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels
> booted but the networking only worked for gcc-4.1 kernel.
Sor
Hum, well .. another sample test:
/* c.c */
extern void func(void*);
void test()
{
register char (*foo)[32] = (typeof(foo))0-1024;
register int index;
for(index=0;index<1024;index++) {
func(foo++);
}
}
gives, in x86_32:
$ gcc-4.3 -c c.c -O3 && objdump -d c.o
c.o: f
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
the current version of gcc-4.3 FTBFS on ppc64. Some small changes are
necessary to build the gcc-4.3 package on ppc64 (see patch below):
* debian/lib32gfortan3.symbols.ppc64:
new file with ppc64 specific symbols
* debi
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:33:58AM +0100, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
> /* b.c */
>
> int main()
> {
> register long foo = 0;
"signed long". Signed integer values have no overflow behaviour in C.
Use "unsigned long" if you want that.
> do {
>asm volatile("nop"::"r"(foo));
> } while(++foo);
Ca
40 matches
Mail list logo
