LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jan 14 13:57:01 UTC 2008 (revision 131527)
Target: s390-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080114 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-19)
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: natgetargssize.cc compilation
FAIL: natgetloca
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jan 14 13:57:01 UTC 2008 (revision 131527)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080114 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-19)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: natgetargssize.cc compilation
FAIL: natget
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 13 21:19:45 UTC 2008 (revision 131510)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jan 14 13:57:01 UTC 2008 (revision 131527)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes1799
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Run
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 17:47
---
The patch appears to fix the problem, but I think it isn't a good fix.
The problem is the backend doesn't know when the LABEL_NUSES counter
needs to be incorrected and when it doesn't.
I think this is reload bug.
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 16:30 ---
Bugs waiting for the committee should not be release-critical; we can restore
this to P3 and reconsider the priority when unsuspending.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 16:32 ---
Bugs waiting for the committee should not be release-critical; we can restore
this to P3 and reconsider the priority when unsuspending.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 14:25
---
> Eric, was your testing successful?
Yes, everything is clean on the IA-64.
> I'll give it a go on ARM now.
Thanks in advance.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628
--- You are receivi
--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-21 12:31 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Created an attachment (id=14907)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14907&action=view) [edit]
> Lightly tested fix.
>
> I'll give it a whirl on IA-64 but it would be nice to test
9 matches
Mail list logo