--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628
--- You are
--- Comment #18 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 03:57 ---
Thanks Kenny, patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00445.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33826
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
Hello there! My name is Veronika.
I am from Russia, 23 years old.
Please vote for me at this site:
http://bestrussiabride.info/?idAff=34
Thank You Very Much!!!
Veronika
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #26 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 23:58 ---
Mark, wrt. the release, I recommend this PR shouldn't be a blocker. The
problem is old and is currently latent on the trunk, where it is only exposed
with non-default options (-fno-inline-small-functions).
Obviousl
--- Comment #25 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 23:44 ---
So this has been failing since at least GCC 3.4. And I see nothing in the
identified patch that is related to how CSE handles its values, so I suspect
this bug exists in older compilers as well (just needs another t
--- Comment #24 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 23:17 ---
A regression test using the test added in comment #23 identified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=74332
r74332 | sayle | 2003-12-05 14:06:46 + (Fri, 05 Dec 2003)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
The problem is that debian/rules.conf assumes there are lib*FFI* files
that need to produce lib*ffi4* files, but that is not true. Instead,
the lib*ffi4* files are already there and are not generated.
I don't know precisely what triggers this bug, but this is somewhere
in the generation of debian
--- Comment #23 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 22:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=14916)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14916&action=view)
new test case that fails before the tree-ssa merge
I made a new test case out of the .final_cleanup dump, and J
--- Comment #22 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 21:24 ---
Steven asked for a regression hunt, but will not be pleased by the results. A
hunt using a hppa64-linux cross cc1 on powerpc-linux identified
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=81764
r81764 | dnovillo |
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 14:03
---
Created an attachment (id=14907)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14907&action=view)
Lightly tested fix.
I'll give it a whirl on IA-64 but it would be nice to test it on ARM too.
--
http:
10 matches
Mail list logo