--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-07
02:48 ---
Subject: Re: ICE optimizing passing long double to abstract method while in
other abstract's impl
> --- Comment #10 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-10-19 21:12 ---
> I forgot to mention that this
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20071020-1
Severity: minor
Usertags: dehs-no-upstream
Hello maintainer,
The debian/watch file of your package on the unstable distribution fails to
report upstream's version.
Uscan's message follows:
uscan warning: In /tmp/gcc-snapshot_watchHDV0Wc no matching
Package: gcj-4.1-base
Version: 4.1.1-20
Severity: important
As root, the compilation of either example Makefile (Makefile.java2d or
Makefile.jawt) fails:
ve6wvc:/usr/share/doc/gcj-4.1-base/examples# make -f Makefile.java2d
make: *** No rule to make target
`../../../../../src/libjava/classpath/e
--- Comment #9 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-11-06 21:52
---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCC generates
wrong code for infinitely recursive functions
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 21
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 21:33
---
> I just talked to mark mitchell who was wearing his official language
> lawyer hat at the time. He said i had to fix it. i will submit a patch
> in the next day or so.
Thanks in advance.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #7 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-11-06 21:21
---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCC generates
wrong code for infinitely recursive functions
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 19
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 19:04
---
> Eric: do you mean that tail recursive calls are not allowed with
> -fstack-check?
No, they are allowed. Optimizing the Ada testcase into an infinite loop is OK
if you don't consume the stack.
--
http://g
--- Comment #5 from sam at rfc1149 dot net 2007-11-06 18:50 ---
Eric: do you mean that tail recursive calls are not allowed with -fstack-check?
With the current trunk, the code is ok with -O3 (tail-recursive call) and still
buggy with -O ("rep ret" on x86). This is even stranger :)
--
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-06 19:06]:
> When I try to bootstrap gcc trunk on mips with gcc-4.2, the fails
> during stage 1. It works when I use gcc-4.1 or gcc-snapshot
> instead. I filed PR34007
I don't see this problem with gcc-4.2 from SVN, so I guess it's fixed.
--
Marti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 449563 + upstream
Bug#449563: Fails to bootstrap gcc trunk on mips
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 449563 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34007
Bug#449563: Fails to bootstrap gcc trunk on mips
Noted your statement that Bug has been f
Hey! :)
A book might be written on the injustice of the just.
Fools may our scorn, not envy, raise. For envy is a kind of praise.
Everything I did in my life that was worthwhile I caught hell for it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: important
When I try to bootstrap gcc trunk on mips with gcc-4.2, the fails
during stage 1. It works when I use gcc-4.1 or gcc-snapshot
instead. I filed PR34007
> gcc -c -g -O -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prot
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20070916-1
PR34005
> Automatic build of vnc_3.3.7-14 on devel-tbm.zee.buildserver.net by
> sbuild/sparc 0.52
...
> gcc -c -O2 -I../.. -I../../exports/include -Dlinux -D__sparc__
> -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2
> -D_BSD_SOU
catch all kind of med on a very lesser price.
pharmstoregone.com.
Remove the dot from the end of the link to use it, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
discussion about warning emited by gcc 4.3 from experimental runs on the
debian-mentors. We have a code (from upstream), that emits a warning and this
is probably against a propositions in C99 std.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/inline$ aptitude search -F %25p%65V ~i~n^gcc
gcc4:4.3-20070902-
15 matches
Mail list logo
