--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
> 4 errors with exactly the same unusable error message.
you should try to rebuild with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=1 to have
readable logs.
The powerpc build should be fixed on next upload, otherwise upstream
configure script stop build if arch isn't i386, amd64, powerpc or
ppc64.
In src/libphob
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #439620
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31037
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 439620 + sta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
severity 439573 important
thanks
Bastian Blank writes:
> severity 439573 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:20:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > buy some glasses, kthxbye.
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=gdc-4.1&suite=unstable
>
> 4 errors with exactly
severity 439573 important
thanks
> No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
> buildd, the others failed.
You'll find the full amd64 build log here [0], excelsior has been able
to build it, and amd64 package has been uploaded from it.
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
severity 439573 serious
thanks
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:20:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> buy some glasses, kthxbye.
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=gdc-4.1&suite=unstable
4 errors with exactly the same unusable error message.
Bastian
--
Vulcans worship peace abov
severity 439573 important
thanks
Bastian Blank writes:
> severity 439573 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Bastian Blank writes:
> > > Package: gdc-4.1
> > > Version: 0.23-4.1.2-15
> > > Severity: serious
> >
> > nice try; you should know be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
severity 439573 serious
thanks
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Bastian Blank writes:
> > Package: gdc-4.1
> > Version: 0.23-4.1.2-15
> > Severity: serious
>
> nice try; you should know better.
No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary pa
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
g++-multilib_4.1.2-8_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
g++-multilib_4.1.2-8_s390.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
g++-mul
Accepted:
cpp_4.1.2-8_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.2-8_alpha.deb
cpp_4.1.2-8_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.2-8_hppa.deb
cpp_4.1.2-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.2-8_i386.deb
cpp_4.1.2-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.2-8_m68k.de
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> > land in NEW, then they
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do
gcc-defaults_1.58_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc_4.1.2-8_m68k.deb
gobjc-multilib_4.1.2-8_sparc.deb
gnat_4.1.2-8_alpha.deb
gobjc++-multilib_4.1.2-8_s390.deb
libgcj-bc_4.1.2-8_hppa.deb
gobjc_4.1.2-8_m68k.deb
gfortran_4.2.1-3_hppa.deb
cpp_4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> notfound 439670 1.0.76-2
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.0.76-2.
> found 439670 1.0.76-5
Bug#439670: depends on non-
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> > Version: 1.0.76-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
> into NEW first.
Irrelevant.
a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and
ther
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> Version: 1.0.76-2
> Severity: serious
looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
into NEW first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
# apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if
Rejected: gij_4.2.1-3_m68k.deb: old version (4:4.2.1-6) in unstable >= new
version (4:4.2.1-3) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: gcj_4.2.1-3_m68k.deb: old version (4:4.2.1-6) in unstable >= new
version (4:4.2.1-3) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: libgcj-bc_4.1.2-8_m68k.deb: old version (4.2.1-6) in
gcc-defaults_1.58_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
g77_3.4.6-27_m68k.deb
gpc_3.4.6-27_i386.deb
g++_4.1.2-8_i386.deb
gobjc-multilib_4.1.2-8_sparc.deb
gnat_4.1.2-8_alpha.deb
gobjc++-multilib_4.1.2-8_s390.deb
libgcj-bc_4.1.2-8_hppa.deb
cpp_4.1.2-8_
gcc-defaults_1.58_multi.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing gcc-defaults_1.58_multi.changes, but keeping its associated files for
now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:12:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line /usr/share/man/man1/appletviewer.1.gz is a dangling symlink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:11:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line please add lib64 symlink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:10:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line obsolete with gcj-4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-comp
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_hppa.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.76-5_sparc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
forwarded 437939 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33194
thanks
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 23:28]:
> ICE is triggered by attached code (simplified code from systemtap):
> % /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ 2.ii
> 2.ii: In member function 'void dwflpp::translate_location()':
> 2.ii:18:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 437939 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33194
Bug#437939: gcc-snapshot: ICE: canonical types differ for identical types
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33194.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
forwarded 437854 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32596
thanks
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-21 16:42]:
> 1.ii:14: internal compiler error: in expand_or_defer_fn, at
> cp/semantics.c:3225
> Please submit a full bug report,
Yes, that's a known issue, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http:/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305
Bug#439616: gcc-snapshot: ICE: stmt marked modified after optimization pass
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 437854 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32596
Bug#437854: gcc-snapshot: ICE in expand_or_defer_fn, at cp/semantics.c:3225
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32596.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
forarded 439616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305
thanks
* brian m. carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 00:34]:
> test.c:90: error: stmt (0x2ad3b9ccfe40) marked modified after optimization
> pass:
> D.3972_4 = strings[i_1];
I guess this is PR32305.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
forwarded 439620 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31037
thanks
* brian m. carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 00:54]:
> md2.c: In function 'MD2Transform':
> md2.c:104: error: definition in block 17 does not dominate use in block 8
> for SSA_NAME: t_36 in statement:
> t_39 = PHI
> PHI argument
> t_36
> fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439620 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31037
Bug#439620: gcc-snapshot: ICE: verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31037.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
43 matches
Mail list logo
