--- Comment #20 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 00:10
---
As the code is deemed valid, we still have a rejects-valid bug on the 4.2
branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20070630 (experimental)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c3a2003
FAIL: c460001
FAIL: c460002
FAIL: cd92001
FAIL: cxg2001
FAIL: cxg2002
FAIL: cxg2003
FAIL: cxg2004
FAIL: cxg2006
FAIL: cxg2007
FAIL: cxg2010
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20070630 (experimental)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cd92001
FAIL: cxh1001
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2313
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is powerpc-unkno
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20070630 (experimental)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cd92001
FAIL: cxh1001
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2313
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gn
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: hppa-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20070630 (experimental)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/ctor1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_t
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20070630 (experimental)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cd92001
FAIL: cxh1001
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2313
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linu
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124)
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124)
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-time
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-time
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124)
Target: hppa-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-time
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes1799
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Run
mps/05-build-stamp] Error 127
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070630'
> make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20070702-1845
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpa
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:32:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413351: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070630-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:32:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423407: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070630-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:32:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428871: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070630-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:32:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424648: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070630-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070630-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070630-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_amd64.deb
gcc-snapsh
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20070630.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_hppa.deb
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_amd64.deb
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot_20070630-1_powerp
--- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-07-02 14:27 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Hello Gerhard,
That info might be a bit outdated. You can check:
http://www.emdebian.org/crosstools.html also a bit outdated.
Add these lines to your sources.list or install emdebian-tools for
binary toolchains.
##
# Emdebian tools [i386 and AMD64]
#
# deb
Hi,
I'm trying to build a cross-toolchain for PowerPC under Debian Etch x86,
by following this guide here:
http://wiki.debian.org/BuildingCrossCompilers?highlight=%28cross%29%7C%28compile%29
I tried to cross compile binutils-2.17 and gcc-4.1. For the gcc build I
had to install also the 64bit vers
21 matches
Mail list logo