Package: libgcj-common
Version: 1:4.1.1-21
Severity: normal
Hello,
/usr/share/doc/libgcj-common is a symlink to gcj-4.1-base (or I guess
gcj-4.2-base in unstable).
The files
/usr/share/doc/libgcj-common/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libgcj-common/copyright
overwrite
/usr/sha
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Sun Jun 3 14:47:41 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Sun Jun 3 09:08:26 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 427185 gcc-4.1
Bug#427185: Warning output when linking 64 bit objects on i386
Bug reassigned from package `zlib' to `gcc-4.1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
reassign 427185 gcc-4.1
thanks
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 03:39:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> unreproducible; works for me in a current unstable environment.
I've just updated again to current unstable (only portmap and findutils
changed) and can still reproduce the problem:
| [EMAIL PROTECT
reassign 427185 zlib
thanks
unreproducible; works for me in a current unstable environment.
Mark Brown writes:
> reassign 427185 gcc-4.1
> found 427185 4.1.2-11
> notfound 427185 1:1.2.3-15
> retitle 427185 Warning output when linking 64 bit objects on i386
> thanks
>
> The enclosed FTBFS in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 427185 zlib
Bug#427185: Warning output when linking 64 bit objects on i386
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `zlib'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #427124
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32182
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 427124 + status-NEW
t
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #427107
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32164
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 427107 + status-NEW
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:59:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427278: gcc-4.2-base: should it better be arch: all?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
--- Comment #31 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-03 07:21 ---
r125227 | dberlin | 2007-05-31 11:37:38 -0400 (Thu, 31 May 2007) | 11 lines
2007-05-27 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix PR/30052
Backport PTA solver from mainline
* pointer-set.c: Copy from m
11 matches
Mail list logo