forwarded 425092 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31344
thanks
* Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-18 20:36]:
> (pre_dec:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp))) -1 (nil)
> (nil))
> ../../../src/libgcc/../libdecnumber/decLibrary.c:65: internal compiler error:
> in extract_insn, at recog.c:2119
This got f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 425092 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31344
Bug#425092: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS [i386]: ICE building libgcc
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31344.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20070515-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/tmp/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070515/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/tmp/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070515/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/i486-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/i486-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 16 00:24:00 UTC 2007 (revision 124753MS)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes12740
# of expected failures 66
# of unsupported tes
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 16 00:24:00 UTC 2007 (revision 124753MS)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C scan-tree-dump-not offset: -4B
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C scan-tree-dump-not &x\\[5\\]
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 16 00:24:00 UTC 2007 (revision 124753MS)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C scan-tree-dump-not offset: -4B
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C scan-tree-dump-not &x\\[5\\]
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 16 00:24:00 UTC 2007 (revision 124753MS)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1096
# of unsupported tests 8
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:22:02AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:01:03PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > > Peter Green writes:
> > >> package:gcc-4.1
> > >> version:4.1.2-7
> > >> severity:serious
> > >>
> > >> from the relavent buildd logs:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:01:03PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Peter Green writes:
> >> package:gcc-4.1
> >> version:4.1.2-7
> >> severity:serious
> >>
> >> from the relavent buildd logs:
> >
> > Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
> >
Sorry...my error.
--George
On Friday 18 May 2007 03:40 pm, peter green wrote:
> > This type of message does not give me a warm and fuzzy feeling
> > that makes me
> > want to work on the Debian arm port.
>
> I'd just like to point out that you are addressing your critisism at the
> wrong person.
> This type of message does not give me a warm and fuzzy feeling
> that makes me
> want to work on the Debian arm port.
I'd just like to point out that you are addressing your critisism at the wrong
person. your reply seems to be directed at a message from a person replying to
me not to me.
Hello Peter,
This type of message does not give me a warm and fuzzy feeling that makes me
want to work on the Debian arm port.
Please think about, being considerate, being respectful and being
collaborative.
--George
On Friday 18 May 2007 09:48 am, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Peter Green write
Package: g77-3.4
Version: 3.4.6-5
Severity: minor
o what is the latest g77 documentation package? All I can find is
g77-2.95-doc, which seems a bit antiquated.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #317563
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22392
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #424626
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 424626 + statu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #421354
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31733
# * remote status changed: NEW -> REOPENED
usertags 421354 - sta
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #329694
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24019
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
# * remote resol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status rep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Peter Green writes:
>> package:gcc-4.1
>> version:4.1.2-7
>> severity:serious
>>
>> from the relavent buildd logs:
>
> Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
> that. Same for arm, and arm porters don't seem to care that much, so
> maybe we sho
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> that. Same for arm, and arm porters don't seem to care that much, so
> maybe we should drop arm as a release architecture?
>
What make you think that? The build failure is known for less than 3
days, please let us time to fix that.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno
Riku Voipio writes:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Peter Green writes:
> > > package:gcc-4.1
> > > version:4.1.2-7
> > > severity:serious
>
> > > from the relavent buildd logs:
>
> > Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
> > that.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Peter Green writes:
> > package:gcc-4.1
> > version:4.1.2-7
> > severity:serious
> > from the relavent buildd logs:
> Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
> that. Same for arm
Is building libffi.so.4
package:gcc-4.1
version:4.1.2-7
severity:serious
from the relavent buildd logs:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link /build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.2/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.2/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/u
Peter Green writes:
> package:gcc-4.1
> version:4.1.2-7
> severity:serious
>
> from the relavent buildd logs:
Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
that. Same for arm, and arm porters don't seem to care that much, so
maybe we should drop arm as a release architecture?
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 13:44:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402971: /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/cstdlib: Error on cstdlib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 424402 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31944
Bug#424402: gcc: Endless loop while building a 64-bit 2.6.20 parisc kernel
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31944.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
reassign 421291 dpkg
thanks
please assign back if a workaround (conflict) should be added in gij-4.1
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 10:44:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > > Package: gij-4.1
> > > Version: 4.1.2-4
> >^^^
> >
> > > Severi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421291 dpkg
Bug#421291: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/gcj-4.1-base/README'
Bug reassigned from package `gij-4.1' to `dpkg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
--- Comment #25 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-18 09:48 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/m
--- Comment #24 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 31344
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 18 08:46:30 2007
New Revision: 124826
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124826
Log:
* PR rtl-optimization/31344 is actually middle-end bug.
M
--- Comment #23 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 09:37 ---
Subject: Bug 31344
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 18 08:37:03 2007
New Revision: 124825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124825
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/31344
* expr.c (emit_move_chan
32 matches
Mail list logo
