This one is shoe in to Double by end of week
Huge Volume spike, many people are already in the know
Bull is Calling in the next soda GIANT
Fire Mtn Beverage Company
SYmb- F_B_V_G
2 Cents is a STEAL
Add this to your radar, Dont miss this one like HANS and FIZ
Remember Snapple, this will be bigg
hello, I am pretty russian girl, bored tonight.
would you like to chat with me and see my pics?
if so then email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31576
--- You
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[regression] Ada bootstrap |[4.3 regression] Ada
|error |
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-21
Severity: normal
When I try to compile the following code, I need the fourth scanf("%i",&k); if
not, the expo variable equals 0.
This bug appears in gcc 4.0 and gcc 4.1 but not in gcc 3.3.
*** Code ***
/*#include */
#include
#include
#include
int puissance
--- Comment #1 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-16 12:38 ---
The same happens on s390 and s390x. The constant Default_Bit_Order is definded
in system.ads:
-- Other System-Dependent Declarations
type Bit_Order is (High_Order_First, Low_Order_First);
Default_Bit_Ord
Julien Danjou writes
> I'd like to begin a NMU campaign to help to fix this bugs.
> Does it seems ok to NMU to delay/7 ?
I wouddn't mind, but please wait until new versions of gcc-4.2 and
gcc-snapshot are in unstable, so that people can easily test.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
At 1176487834 time_t, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> "a few" =~ 400, but yes, they are trivial to fix and patches for
> almost all of them exist. I'll start filing other 4.3 related bugs in
> the coming weeks.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.3;[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
I'd
Package: g++
Version: 4.1.1-15
When compiling a simple C++ file on x86_64 for the i386 architecture
using -export-dynamic, I got this error:
$ g++ -m32 -export-dynamic -o test test.cpp
/usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib32/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches
non-TLS definition in
/usr/lib
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Mon Apr 16 01:32:18 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
