--- Comment #47 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 08:29 ---
With RTH's "alternate patch" applied, I can now bootstrap mipsel-linux
The test results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00036.html
And are substancially similar to what I was getting befor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 416973 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31415
Bug#416973: gnat-4.1: Illegal program not detected, Ada 2005, 3.9.4(12/2) and
7.5(6.1/2)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31415.
> forwarded 416975 http://gcc.gnu.org/
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the program below, the full views (in the private part) of T2 and
T3 are both illegal because the value of the discriminant, x2, is not
static. RM 7.3(13) states that the parent subtype of T2 and T3
(i.e. T1) must impose a statically matchin
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the program below, the full declaration of T2 (in the private part
of the package) is illegal because it conflicts with the public
declaration. The public declaration defines the discriminant, d1, to
have the value 3 whereas the private decl
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the following program, the declaration of T3 is illegal because it
extends a limited type (T1) and a nonlimited interface (T2).
-- compiled -gnat05
-- error not detected
package pak1 is
-- RM 3.9.4(12/2) and 7.5(6.1/2)
-- check that bo
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 22:29
---
Subject: Bug 31364
Author: pinskia
Date: Sat Mar 31 22:29:21 2007
New Revision: 123390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123390
Log:
2007-03-31 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 22:30
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--
ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ismail at pardus dot org dot
|
--- Comment #46 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-03-31
15:38 ---
Subject: Re: Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821
> --- Comment #45 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 15:13
> ---
> doh, me neither.
I just started a build with your patch
--- Comment #45 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 15:13
---
doh, me neither.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31169
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCR
--- Comment #44 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-03-31
15:10 ---
Subject: Re: Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821
> Wouldn't it be slightly better to just call range_includes_zero_p (&vr1)
> and return at this point?
Forget that, I didn't notice the "else" a
--- Comment #43 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 11:27
---
I would have unconditionally set the maximum of the shift value range to
prec-1. I guess reverting the last hunk with range_includes_zero_p was
accidential?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3116
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||26792
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #16 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-03-31 10:28 ---
Also why does configure set HAVE_GETIPINFO unconditionally when the system
libunwind is used?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Comment #15 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-03-31 10:18 ---
This still does not work. When configuring the stage2 compiler the symbol will
be found in libgcc_s (from unwind-compat.o).
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
