Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso writes:
> I'm well aware of Debian's stance on GFDL docs (though I have a hard
> time agreeing with it myself), but an important package like not
> containing a manpage at all is a policy violation, and having the
> manpage along with the rest of the documentation in the non
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 10 Mar 2007 00:48:31 +0100, a écrit :
> > Matthias Klose, le Fri 09 Mar 2007 09:44:55 +0100, a écrit :
> > > thanks for the patch. Please could you update it for gcj-4.1 from
> > > experimental?
> >
> > Mmm, there's something odd with gcj-4.1 from
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Mmm, gcj-4.1 build-depends on itself, gcj-4.1. Is that on purpose? (the
> compilation seems to need it indeed).
yes. build the packages from unstable first; an alternative might be
to use the gcc-snapshot package for your first build.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
I'm well aware of Debian's stance on GFDL docs (though I have a hard
time agreeing with it myself), but an important package like not
containing a manpage at all is a policy violation, and having the
manpage along with the rest of the documentation in the non-free
section is unacceptable, as Debia
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:42:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396609: gnat-4.1: Link fails (Message: gnatlink.adb:1731
range check failed)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Matthieu,
>
> I have not been able to reproduce this bug, but it appears to be in a
> Windows-specific part of gnatlink which we can safely remove. Could
> you please try to recompile gnatlink with the following patch and see
> if it solves your pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
