Processed: Please assign back to libgcj-common: missing symlink handling

2007-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396583 libgcj-common Bug#396583: libgcj-common: Link to gcj-4.1-base makes checksums mismatch Bug reassigned from package `debsums' to `libgcj-common'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Please assign back to libgcj-common: missing symlink handling

2007-02-21 Thread Peter Moulder
reassign 396583 libgcj-common thanks Brendan O'Dea's message of 3 Nov 2006 to #396583 indicates a failure of libgcj-common's control scripts to clean up a symlink created by a previous version (apparently libgcj-common 1:4.1.0-2j1, see below). The result is that /usr/share/doc/$P/{changelog.Debi

[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor

2007-02-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #16 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 02:02 --- quite better ( modulo coding style ) patch is: --- class.c.orig2006-10-12 22:02:53.0 +0200 +++ class.c 2007-02-22 02:54:11.888652367 +0100 @@ -5105,15 +5105,15 @@ tree dtor; dtor = CLASSTY

[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor

2007-02-21 Thread ben at decadent dot org dot uk
--- Comment #15 from ben at decadent dot org dot uk 2007-02-22 01:10 --- Pawel: Yes, any friend class or function can call a protected or private destructor wrongly. So can members of the class - in fact, even pure virtual members can, since they may still have definitions! The curren

[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor

2007-02-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #14 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 00:13 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Already posted as , > with no response. this patch doesn't cover one situation: struct D; struct C { virtual void f() = 0; prote

Bug#411939: gcc-snapshot_20061217-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS

2007-02-21 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
some defines need to have changed. Therefor I'm really not sure who's at fault here. | Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20061217-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm | Build started at 20070221-1317 | ** | Checking a

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2007-02-21 Thread munir
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Wed Feb 21 09:57:20 2007 Please save this email message for future reference. -