Hi
It`s kellie again. Will you ever contact me?
I made those nude pictures especially for you and I wont write to you again!
If you wanna see them just drop me a line at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
--
Bug 29329 depends on bug 25514, which changed state.
Bug 25514 Summary: [4.0 regression] internal consistency failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25514
What|Old Value |New Value
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >> reassign 312367 gcc-4.1
> > Bug#312367: gcc-4.0: D support (gdc)
> > Bug#317983: RFP: gdc -- D Front End for GCC
> > Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gcc-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> reassign 312367 gcc-4.1
> Bug#312367: gcc-4.0: D support (gdc)
> Bug#317983: RFP: gdc -- D Front End for GCC
> Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gcc-4.1'.
Doesn't that assume that we'll
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:25:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line csound build failure fixed in gcc-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:00:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357900: gcc-4.0: Please detect and warn about 2 argument
mode() called with O_CREAT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 357900 + wontfix
Bug#357900: gcc-4.0: Please detect and warn about 2 argument mode() called with
O_CREAT
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 355621 gcc-4.1
Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gcc-4.1'.
> found 355621 4.1.1-9
Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO
Bug marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376427 + wontfix
Bug#376427: gcc-4.0: arm-linux cross build mistakenly invokes native assembler
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 312367 gcc-4.1
Bug#312367: gcc-4.0: D support (gdc)
Bug#317983: RFP: gdc -- D Front End for GCC
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gcc-4.1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:47:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:10:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.0: arm-linux cross build mistakenly invokes native
assembler
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:13:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.0: ICE building clisp on amd64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:44:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.0: GCC 4.0.3 miscompile debugging information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376468 + wontfix
Bug#376468: Should use xargs --no-run-if-empty
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:34:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 345587 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28314
Bug#345587: [PR28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28314.
> reassign 345587 cpp
Bug#345587: [PR28314] cpp: x86/
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:49:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376468: Should use xargs --no-run-if-empty
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
18 matches
Mail list logo
