Bug#401585: [m68k] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1079

2006-12-09 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: > Roman, do you intend to provide a fix for gcc-4.1? Attached, it's an update to the m68k-fpcompare patch. For the log: Allow any fp constant as any immediate operand during and after reload, even for special constants in case reload can't find a fr

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 19:36 --- I now have a fix for both issues (fixing the first problem of ineffient gimplification is enough to fix this bug but might not be enough to fix others). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30132

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 19:24 --- The second issue (the invalid gimple), comes from marking a variable as ADDRESSABLE late after the orginal gimplification to that variable had happened: /* Mark the RHS addressable. */ lang_hooks

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 19:11 --- We have: if ((fallback & fb_lvalue) == 0) { result = tmp2 = tmp = create_tmp_var (TREE_TYPE (expr), "iftmp"); ret = GS_ALL_DONE; } But fallback is "fallback=fb_either" so th

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

2006-12-09 Thread munir
The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Sat Dec 9 10:55:20 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/30131] ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1583

2006-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 15:11 --- Related to PR28282 and PR12535. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Bu

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 14:24 --- After gimplification: D.1853 = *t; if (D.1853 == __complex__ (0.0, 0.0)) { D.1854 = __complex__ (0.0, 0.0); iftmp.0 = &D.1854; } else { D.1855 = *t; D.1856 = -D.1855; i

[Bug middle-end/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 14:22 --- Also note moving catching it earlier makes this a middle-end (gimplifier) issue rather than an optimization issue. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Adde

[Bug tree-optimization/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 14:20 --- Note, what we have is invalid gimple which we don't catch until tree-complex.c which is wrong, I have a patch to catch it earlier. Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remov

[Bug tree-optimization/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 13:20 --- The gimplifier is messing up ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30132 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIB

[Bug tree-optimization/30132] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133

2006-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to fail||4.1

Processed: biarch & cross build support

2006-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 395022 384939 Bug#384939: cross-compile with WITHOUT_LANG=biarch still wants to build biarch Bug#395022: small problems building a x86->amd64 cross Merged 384939 395022. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#395022: biarch & cross build support

2006-12-09 Thread Matthias Klose
merge 395022 384939 thanks could somebody from the embedded people have a look at it? thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/30129] [4.1 regression] ICE (segfault) in C++ code

2006-12-09 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 11:39 --- works in Debian unstable as well; Ubuntu specific. -- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: forwarded gcc report

2006-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 397341 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30131 Bug#397341: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30131. > tags 397341 + upstream Bug#397341: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE There were no tags set.

[Bug c++/30129] [4.1 regression] ICE (segfault) in C++ code

2006-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 11:11 --- works with 4.1.2 r119687. Works with g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux). g++-4.1 -v? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- Y

Bug#401585: [m68k] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1079

2006-12-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Roman, do you intend to provide a fix for gcc-4.1? Thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/30129] [4.1 regression] ICE (segfault) in C++ code

2006-12-09 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-12-09 10:20 --- works with 4.0.3 -- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug c++/30129] ICE (segfault) in C++ code

2006-12-09 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
-- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debia