In addition to that stat.

2006-11-23 Thread Elliot G. Hutchinson
Fascinating presentation of sculptures on wheels! He now faces a well-meaning three-week ban from play. Whichever way you try and spin that fact, it has been a facking pathetic showing for over half a decade. 000 *** CNHC *** CNHC *** CNHC *** Trade Date: Friday, November 24, 2006 Company: Chin

Re: gcc-h8300-hms (4.1.1-3): FTBFS on arm

2006-11-23 Thread Wookey
On 2006-11-23 23:42 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi all! > > First of all: I'm neither subscribed to debian-gcc nor debian-arm, so please > CC > me -thanks! > > I've recently adopted the gcc-h8300-hms cross compiler package, which finally > builds on all archs but arm. The latest buildd-lo

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-11-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-23 22:51 --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have insufficient privileges to close this bug. Please, someone, close it as > FIXED. Thanks. You should be able to use your @gcc.gnu.org account to close the bug report. -- pinsk

gcc-h8300-hms (4.1.1-3): FTBFS on arm

2006-11-23 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi all! First of all: I'm neither subscribed to debian-gcc nor debian-arm, so please CC me -thanks! I've recently adopted the gcc-h8300-hms cross compiler package, which finally builds on all archs but arm. The latest buildd-log may be found at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcc-h8300-hms

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-11-23 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-11-23 18:55 --- I have insufficient privileges to close this bug. Please, someone, close it as FIXED. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9072 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-11-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-23 18:39 --- Subject: Bug 9072 Author: manu Date: Thu Nov 23 18:39:32 2006 New Revision: 119129 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119129 Log: 2006-11-23 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c/

Bug#400031: gcc-4.1: Enable -pthread for GNU/Hurd

2006-11-23 Thread Michael Banck
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1ds2-20 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, currently, the -pthread option is not understood by the GNU/Hurd gcc, which makes some packages FTBFS, e.g. directfb. The attached addition to hurd-changes.dpatch fixes this. Michael --- gcc/config/gnu.h.orig 2006-

gcc test environment

2006-11-23 Thread Weidong Cui
Hi, everyone: I want to test current active gcc code on my Debian system and report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regularly. My questions are: 1. Which version is better ( stable, testing or unstable ?)? . 2. Which gcc version should I base on ? Thanks in advance. Weidong Cui -- To UNSUB